Laserfiche WebLink
John Dill <br />Page 2 <br />September 14, 2009 <br />A short summary of our proposals follows: <br /> The first proposal would amend the Hawai’i County Code of Ethics Fair <br />Treatment Section 2-83 to prohibit county employees and companies in which <br />county employees or their spouses or dependent children own a controlling <br />interest from engaging in business arrangements with any county agency. While I <br />am aware that enterprising county workers have a long history of providing goods <br />and services to the county through their private companies, I believe the larger <br />community no longer considers this practice to be acceptable. This proposal is <br />not meant as a commentary on any past arrangement. It is simply an <br />acknowledgement that today our community expects that we will be either county <br />employees or county contractors, but not both. <br /> The second proposal is a technical change deleting the Hawai’i County Code of <br />Ethics Contracts Section 2-85(a) because the conduct described and specifically <br />authorized in Section 2-85(a) would be prohibited under our first proposal (see <br />above). The existing Section 2-85(b) would be renumbered as Section 2-85(a). <br />This proposal also makes a technical correction by including the word “is” in the <br />new Section 2-85(a) where the word was apparently excluded in error. <br /> The third proposal adopts into the Hawai’i County Code of Ethics Conflicts of <br />Interests section language prohibiting any elected or appointed officer or <br />employee from appearing on behalf of any private interests before any county <br />agency except as specifically provided for by law. The narrow exceptions to this <br />prohibition assure that employees will continue to enjoy the right to appear before <br />county agencies to petition for redress of grievances. <br />This proposed language is virtually identical to language already in place in the <br />Honolulu City Charter and Honolulu Code of Ethics. Again, this proposal is <br />acknowledgment that today the public believes our roles as county employees <br />make it inappropriate that we engage in certain outside activities. The public <br />expects we will be county employees, or we will be representatives of private <br />interests before county agencies, but not both. <br /> The fourth proposal would redefine the use of the term “agency” in the ethics <br />code to make it more encompassing, and to make the use of the term more <br />clear. <br /> Finally, we hope to join forces with the Board of Ethics in supporting changes to <br />state law that would empower the Board of Ethics to levy administrative fines for <br />infractions of the County Ethics Code. <br />As you know, the County Council in 2008 adopted Ordinance No. 08-57 <br />authorizing the board to impose administrative fines, but the intent of this <br />language has been stymied by two provisions in state law. <br />County of Hawai`i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. <br /> <br />