My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Mayor Kenoi's ethics proposals
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Documents
>
Mayor Kenoi's ethics proposals
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 7:49:52 AM
Creation date
6/21/2011 7:49:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
John Dill <br />Page 3 <br />September 14, 2009 <br />The first problem is that HRS Sec. 46-1.5(24)(A) has been interpreted by some to <br />mean that a county agency may impose a civil fine only when a) a violator has <br />been found in violation, and b) the violator continues the violation without <br />modifying the offending conduct. We agree with Honolulu Board of Ethics <br />Executive Director Charles Totto that this interpretation renders the power to fine <br />useless because violators can simply terminate the offending conduct in order to <br />avoid any fine. <br />The Legislature has had proposals before it in 2007, 2008 and 2009 to clarify this <br />language to allow fines to be imposed when violations are first discovered, but <br />the bills stalled. We understand the Hawai’i Board of Ethics voted in August to <br />support the efforts of the Honolulu Board of Ethics in pressing for this reform. We <br />plan to partner with both ethics boards to pursue this issue aggressively at the <br />Legislature in 2010 to finally give the Board of Ethics the powers that the Hawai’i <br />County Council intended. <br />A related issue is that state law requires that when an offender is fined <br />administratively, that offender must have an avenue by which he or she can <br />appeal that fine. Under existing law, the county may be required to create what <br />amounts to an appeals panel for the Board of Ethics to hear appeals of <br />administrative fines imposed by the Board. This would be a cumbersome and <br />little-used process. As an alternative, we would like to collaborate with the <br />Hawai’i County Board of Ethics and the Honolulu Board of Ethics to lobby the <br />Legislature to amend state law to explicitly state that appeals of administrative <br />fines for ethics violations are made directly to Circuit Court. This will fulfill the <br />requirement for a fair appeals process, and will avoid the need to create an <br />entirely new county board to hear appeals cases. <br />The Ethics Code serves as a guide for both employees and the public to encourage <br />proper conduct, and it also helps define the community’s expectations for public <br />employees. I believe these proposals will advance the Ethics Code in a way that <br />promotes public confidence in county government, and fosters accountability. <br />I welcome your suggestions and comments, and look forward to working closely with <br />this board on these proposals in the weeks ahead as we advance this package for <br />review by the County Council. <br />Aloha, <br />William P. Kenoi <br />MAYOR <br />County of Hawai`i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.