My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-01-28 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-01-28 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:06:55 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:06:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. TAKABA: <br />They reduced it by about 50% over the last one year. And the ones <br />they allow are more those that respond to emergencies so they don’t have to come in to <br />the office topick up the key or to the motor pool, pick up their car and then respond. <br />They can go on their way to work. <br />MS. PROVALENKO: <br />That’s why I think this should be explained a little bit more. If we <br />eliminate County take home vehicles, and like I was under the impression it was <br />essential services that were allowed to take them home. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />Is there much abuse on private use of the cars? <br />MR. TAKABA: <br />I’m not sure about the abuse, but there are some vehicles that really <br />don’t need to be taken home. Some of it was because of vandalism. Like you would <br />park it at the County building and at night somebody would vandalize the vehicle. So in <br />areas that the cars are parked and are high risk, usually the employees are allowed to <br />take it home. But we’ve stopped that. Even that policy has changed. So, in terms of <br />who should take the vehicles home, it’s really restricted now. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />So is this still even an issue? We did get quite a few comments on <br />this, but maybe the policy was tightened up recently. <br />MS. PROVALENKO: <br />And I think there was a perception too that maybe that had been <br />there for a while. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Well, maybe there’s no harm in keeping it in. <br />MS. PROVALENKO: <br />The way it reads though, eliminate County vehicle. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />How about restrict the use of County take home vehicles. <br />MS. PROVALENKO: <br />Yeah. I think that would be better because in those essential <br />services, those people need to have those vehicles. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />So then, restrict the use of County take home vehicles to essential <br />services? To first responders? <br />MR. MATSUDA: <br />You don’t need to say first responders or anything. <br />MS. PROVALENKO: <br />I think just restrict the use. I think restricting is better. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br />If you make it too specific, you’re going to rule out even police from <br />taking home the vehicles. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />I think we should put number 1 and 3 side-by-side since they are <br />the same. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />I think we have some more telecommunications. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />In another section? <br />27 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.