My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-01-28 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-01-28 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:06:55 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:06:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. ARMOUR: <br />I thought I saw some somewhere else. So if we do, I suggest that <br />maybe we put those all together, unless we did that at the last meeting. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Okay, then when we get those then let’s move them up too. Well, <br />this is travel. So I think you’re right Ken, we did have some technology things that were <br />maybe a little separate from travel. When we come across them, we can talk about it. <br />I think these Department-Specific Suggestions should not be sort of buried in the midst <br />of all the rest of these. It should probably come at the end or something. It kind of <br />breaks the flow by having department-specific suggestions, so we can go ahead and <br />talk about them now, but I think for now we might want to move them to either before or <br />after what is now F. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />Maybe we should group the departments’suggestions together if <br />they’re not. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Well, they are now. Okay, so we go from the sort of general <br />County-wide things to departments. I think we should move Staffing/Consolidations up <br />so E should be the next topic. E should become D. So, let’s jump to E and then we’ll <br />go back to those. So we’re looking at Staffing/Consolidations. Consolidating <br />Enforcement. This one, we may need to go back tothe minutes of that meeting. It was <br />very specific in terms of what enforcement functions should be consolidated and as Bill <br />said, the discussion was we have various inspections, inspectors going out. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />This is a suggestion from Scott Leonard. It’s on the first page –I <br />recommend that the enforcement responsibilities of Planning Department, Building <br />Department, Real Property Tax, Environmental Management and the Department of <br />Health (as contracted effort from the state to the County since this is a state function) be <br />consolidated into an Enforcement Division under the Police Department. And then it <br />goes on about the benefits. And it’s another half a page. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />How about if we keep that except maybe strike,under the Police <br />Department,cause I don’t know that we want to try to recommend where it belongs. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />I agree. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Number 2. Gloria, do you want to say something here about this <br />because we’ve identified that this is a key function of the County or do you just want to <br />leave it like this? Or once we get our priority statement, maybe we’ll take this out and <br />put this in there? Or should we just leave it as is for now and then we’ll look at it again <br />later when we get those other statements. <br />MS. WONG: <br />Okay, what you said. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Okay. Number 3. <br />MS. WONG: <br />Another excellent thought. <br />28 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.