My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-01-28 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-01-28 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:06:55 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:06:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. WONG: <br />Madam Chair, I would certainly like to get Bill Takaba’s input before I <br />actually finish coming out with the summary. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Well, you have a little bit of time if this is going to go on the agenda <br />for the next meeting. We need to have that by sometime next week? <br />thth, <br />MS. GARSON: <br />Yes, if it’s the 11, yeah. Six days prior to the 11the latest. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Do you think you can do that? If not it would just move into the next <br />meeting. <br />MS. WONG: <br />I can do that. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Any other discussion? <br />MS. GARSON: <br />So, can I just be clear? What is it that we’re going to put on the next <br />agenda? Do you want us to break down, put this on the agenda for discussion? Or are <br />you going to come up with a subsequent <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />I think Gloria is going to probably talk to Bill and prepare a <br />recommendation document which would go on the agenda. And then we’ll have that <br />also as a discussion item because she’ll get it to you in time to go out with the agenda <br />whether it’s the next one or the second meeting in February. And then we put that as <br />an agenda item, and as long as we can make sure that all of these boards and <br />commissions, including us, know that it’s going to be discussed, it will give them a <br />chance to provide some feedback. <br />MS. WONG: <br />May I ask, since Glen is also on the committee, any comments that I <br />might have missed? <br />MR. MATSUDA: <br />Well, the only comment that I would have is in regards to those <br />commissions whichever they are, or committees that meet quarterly, how are you going <br />to get responses back from them? Or monthly. Maybe they met for the month of <br />February already, so how are you going to get any kind of response? That would be my <br />concern. Because if we’re looking for responses from them we have to discuss <br />MS. WONG: <br />And to answer, <br />MR. MATSUDA: <br />That’s the only concern I would have. Because we’re really waiting <br />for that. <br />MS. WONG: <br />And I think the communication would have to tie in, although it’s <br />addressed to the committee members, it would have to tie in to whichever department <br />oversees their function, supportsit, and should also be responding. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />So then we are asking for a response, either in person or as Kathy <br />said, they might not even get this and be able to respond for two months. What is the <br />best? I guess that’s what we’re trying to get at. What is the best way? <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.