My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-01-28 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-01-28 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:06:55 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:06:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. MATSUDA: <br />It’s better to get it out there then nothing at all. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />I mean, we may get a response,using A again as an example, we <br />may get a response from the Arborist committee, but not from the Ag committee. And <br />so until we get a response from both of them, it seems to me it’s a little presumptuous to <br />be making a recommendation about those unless we have feedback from someone <br />either a department or the committee itself. So, I guess I’m saying, it’s fine to put iton <br />the agenda but we almost have to provide a way for them to respond in writing if they <br />don’t want to appear in person. These are all volunteer committees and they might not <br />be able to send someone from Kohala down to testify. <br />MR. MATSUDA: <br />So, in that light, we take into consideration those people who do <br />respond and who do meet the criteria that we’re looking at. Because not everybody is <br />going to be able to respond on time, but some of them may be so we can maybe take it <br />a portion at a time per se, because the other committees didn’t meet or commissions <br />didn’t meet yet. But those that did, maybe we can work on that and go from there. <br />Because if everybody submits it all at one time then we’re talking about a big job. <br />Maybe it’s better being that way because as the responses come in then we can tackle <br />them one at a time. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />I would expect the strongest responses would be from ones who <br />object to being combined or eliminated. <br />MR. MATSUDA: <br />Yes, very much so. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Gloria, give us some guidance here on how we can best proceed to <br />get the kind of feedback you feel we need for inaudible this item. <br />MS. WONG: <br />I think we just go ahead with the summary and ask and see what <br />response and we can adjust as needed. And if we get no response, that will be also an <br />answer for us to find another avenue. <br />MS. GARSON: <br />Okay. So this letter to the chair people of those boards and <br />commissions, you want a letter to go out as soon as you give me the report so we can <br />th <br />tell them what may be discussed? I mean, you want the letter to go out before the 11? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />So if you can get it done, otherwise it would roll to the next <br />commission meeting. <br />MS. GARSON: <br />So, it’s to the chair and to whatever department may be connected to it <br />th <br />saying that this is what will be discussed at the meeting on the 11or possibly at <br />following meetings. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />And don’t you want to invite them to either appear to provide a <br />written response or not? <br />MS. WONG: <br />Yes. I know that this would be extraordinary to ask them to come here to <br />speak because we have so many of them. But I’m good with getting a written response <br />of some sort, but either way will be wonderful if they would respond. <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.