Laserfiche WebLink
council and say, look, we’re really hurting in these five or six positions and we need to <br />have those filled, and the others we understand. Here’s another level of five or six <br />positions that we really feel are important and pursue it in that matter. And then have a <br />council ad hoc committee to really review the effort and go to the department heads <br />involved and try to get better information. Or have our legislative assistants do some of <br />that work. There’s nothing wrong with legislative assistants in taking some of the work <br />so to speak. And I don’t know that all of us use our leg assistants as competently as we <br />could in that regard. That would be one way of looking at it. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Thank you. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Any questions? I have questions. You have talked about each <br />department doing three budget scenarios. And that was based on department heads? <br />MR. HOFFMANN: <br />I’m sorry. Yes. I’m looking at a three level budget. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Basically to determine what their priorities are. Where does public <br />input fit in all that? <br />MR. HOFFMANN: <br />Well initially, I’m not sure Madam Chair, that the initial documents, I <br />think should be done in-house by the administration first. After all it is their budget to <br />begin. It’s only when that budget is then handed to the council that I feel, then becomes <br />the council budget and it’s the council’s responsibility then to seek public input and go <br />further. So, initially much as we did in DOD and in government today at federal level, <br />things are done in-house initially, and then subject to review after it is presented. Only <br />the administration would know initially where those cuts might come and what their <br />prioritization of effort is. And you hit exactly on the point too, that I think underlies a lot <br />of this –that’s a prioritization by the departments. And that’s important. A lot of times <br />we don’t see that. And even in the council’s budget reviews when we come up with this, <br />I don’t think the council does as good a job as they should in tackling the review of each <br />department’s budget process. We get three days. And let me tell you, we’re whipped <br />by the end of two days. And there’s only in my experience anyway since I’ve been on <br />the council, there have been several department’s that have done very well in budget <br />reviews or in presentations to us. And other departments I would just have not done the <br />job. And to mention I think, Darryl Oliveira in the Fire Department, that certainly, if <br />you’ve ever seen his budget process, at least the ones he’s presented the past couple <br />of years, I think those are outstanding. My questions are answered if I read what he <br />gives me and if I ask him a couple of questions, I walk away feeling he’s at least told me <br />where his priorities are and where he’s going in the next year. I don’t get that from <br />every department. That’s just me. I don’t know what others have. But in answer to <br />your initial question, I think the departments should set the priorities and move ahead on <br />this and decide how that’s going to look. And then it’s up to the council to decide and to <br />try to work with the administration cooperatively, and then see whether we shouldn’t <br />have, don’t forget we do have public hearings, theoretically. And that’s supposed to <br />elicit the public response. By Charter we have to do that if I’m not mistaken. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br />I’m sorry, I missed part of it. The three level budget, is it a three level <br />budget review or three level … <br />12 <br /> <br />