My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-12-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-12-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:07:54 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:07:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MS. O’HARA: <br />May I make a recommendation? Perhaps we should go over each of <br />these and just make sure that the wording that has been provided is what we want to <br />receive in the report. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Okay. Does that work for everybody? <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />For instance in item A, I’m not sure that monitor is the operative word. I <br />would say we would ask them to review their process for qualifying agricultural property <br />tax exemptions and consider including financial documentation. That would be more <br />the recommendation that I would put forth. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />But at the same time, Ken’s subcommittee is still working at this <br />issue and so how we want to express it in afinal form to me is still going to come out <br />probably of that subcommittee and probably more detailed than what we see here. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br />There is a lot more that we’re looking at then just that one line. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />So, I agree with you. What you had just suggested. I think monitor <br />is probably not the right word for this. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />And it sounds like it may be a little too early to finalize the actual <br />language that we want to appear in the report, if I’m understanding you correctly. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />So what we can do is go through these and fine tune what we have <br />in front of us, but realize that we’re going probably add some explanation. We’re going <br />to figure out how we’re going to categorize these once we see more of them. So shall <br />we go through them one-by-one and just fine tune any wording we have at the moment? <br />And we’ll just continue to carry them forward and we can add to them, rearrange them <br />as go forward. So for A. We have some suggested different wording. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />Hopefully somebody took that down. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />What do we have? <br />Review the process for qualifying agricultural property tax exemptions and consider <br />including financial documentation to show agricultural activity. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Okay, B. Implement software solutions –we’re fine with the way <br />this is currently worded? <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />No, it’s toogeneral. Number one, this is a specific recommendation to a <br />department, the Department of Environmental Management. And the recommendation <br />is to implement software solutions to coordinate collection of tipping fees at the scale <br />house and insure accounting systems are able to read the data. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Okay. Let’s have that. Can we move on? C. Regulating septic <br />and grease haulers. <br />34 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.