My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-11-17 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-11-17 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 4:19:47 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:08:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. DISCUSSION OF SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT PRESENTED AT OCTOBER 22, <br />2010, AND NOVEMBER 3, 2010, MEETINGS <br />A. Operations, Budget, and Consolidation Report. <br />Ms. Wong had distributed a handout. She and Bill Takaba had met with Ron Takahashi, <br />Warren Lee, BJ Leithead Todd, and Nancy Crawford. She had tried to make her report more <br />factual than interpretive. <br />Ms. Wong basically read her report to the commissioners. See her report on "meeting <br />summaries" dated October 12, 2010. <br />The Chair asked Ms. Wong if there was anything in her report she wanted to include in <br />their draft recommendations. Ms. Wong said some of the items were already noted. Ms. <br />Leithead Todd felt very strongly about eliminating action committees. <br />Ms. O'Hara said she agreed with eliminating action committees, having been on one <br />herself, and that it should be up to Planning to move CDP guidelines forward. Planning is <br />developing the expertise internally, and the action committees are just an added expense. <br />Ms. Wong said her gut feeling was to agree. <br />The Chair said she also was involved in an action committee, which had been specifically <br />requested because it was felt the county would ignore the things in the CDP. The action <br />committee tried to ensure that things in the CDP came to fruition, because previously they had <br />not. She felt action committees were needed. <br />Ms. O'Hara said that the last CDP which came out of Puna was never adopted. It sat on a <br />shelf at Planning and was ignored. If a CDP is adopted by ordinance, it is a requirement of <br />Planning to implement it. Otherwise, a community's recourse would be to voice its concerns to <br />the Council. Ms. Leithead Todd's point may be that action committees are redundant because a <br />community can get involved instead. She believes the community can now trust Planning to <br />implement a CDP. <br />The Chair said they could specifically talk about what Ms. Leithead Todd brought up and <br />see if they could come to a resolution, or they could talk about the boards and commissions <br />brought up by her one at a time and try to get a handle on them. It could be a future agenda item. <br />The latter was agreed upon. <br />The Chair said she wanted to start moving towards drafting a report and listing <br />recommendations, to make sure none were lost. <br />Ms. O'Hara brought up Nancy Crawford's section of Ms. Wong's report, where she had <br />discussed the high cost of video broadcasting council meetings. She noted that Lincoln Ashida <br />had also submitted input on the high cost of videotaping meetings, stating that the council is not <br />required to videotape as many proceedings as they do. <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.