Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. O'Hara said she would like to add the Real Property Tax Division to the list of <br />departments on which to focus. <br />B. Revenue Enhancement and Collections. <br />Ms. Provalenko reported that she was awaiting information on fines and revenue <br />collections from Bill Takaba and was at a standstill until that information was received. <br />C. Technology Recommendations and Adoption. <br />Ms. O'Hara said a report had been submitted at the October meeting which consisted of a <br />log of information. A summary of their efforts was also submitted, which is a graphic that ties in <br />with the subcommittees and some of the over - arching themes they decided to look at. <br />The Chair said that at the November 3 meeting they did not have a printed report but <br />rather talked about the meeting they'd had, which was incorporated into the minutes. So their <br />report was in the minutes. They had not received back a communication from Data Systems, but <br />it could be agendized when it is received. In their discussion with Data Systems, and reported in <br />the last minutes, was a county -wide technology plan. She asked whether they wanted to put that <br />forward as a recommendation. <br />Ms. O'Hara suggested they do a follow -up letter to Burt Tsuchiya of Data Systems, <br />asking for their recommendations in writing. This was discussed, and Ms. O'Hara said she <br />would email Data Systems and give them a deadline. <br />Ms. O'Hara provided a few samples of county -wide technology plans and said they're <br />easily available on the internet. <br />The Chair asked if they wanted to put forth a county technology plan as a <br />recommendation now, or wait until they receive Data System's communication. Ms. O'Hara <br />said they should wait. <br />The Chair wanted to make sure a county -wide technology plan is agendized, in case it is <br />not actually in the communication from Data systems. <br />7. REPORTS FROM SUBCOMMITTEES <br />A. Operations, Budget, and Consolidation. <br />Ms. Wong said she wanted thank you letters sent to all the people that had met with the <br />subcommittee members or had spoken at one of their meetings, as a courtesy and recognition for <br />their participation. <br />Ms. Garson said she could provide their email addresses and suggested that those who <br />met with the COGC could be sent a thank you from the Chair, and those who met with <br />subcommittees could receive a thank you from the subcommittees. However, Ms. Wong felt all <br />the thank you letters should come from the Chair. <br />25 <br />