My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-10-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-10-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:08:47 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:08:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
responses were very specific to his recommendations. This in itself will increase <br />property taxes by encouraging individuals to obtain building permits if you can have <br />such a type two building permit. But it will also start eventually resulting in revenues to <br />the county in the form of real property tax. Now Scott had many ideas if you have seen <br />and read his recommendations. I did want to discuss that he be invited to a commission <br />meeting to further discuss his recommendations and elaborate on his <br />recommendations. He did agree to present to our committee and recommend that he <br />was giving recommendation for our committee or to the body, the commission, at our <br />next commission meeting. When, I do not know. This body can decide if so and when, <br />and I believe we can do that, Kathy, correct? Invite him to a commission meeting. <br />MS. GARSON: <br />Items to be placed on the next agenda. <br />MR. MATSUDA: <br /> Okay, so on the next agenda. But he agreed to come and speak at <br />our commission meeting and he’d be glad to speak at the commission meeting. He’s a <br />very good speaker. I believe it would be very good for the commission to hear him, as <br />I’m sure the commission members will have a lot of questions. If there’s anything I <br />missed, Gloria, please say so at this time. I just put together what my thoughts were. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> Well, I want to make sure that everyone received the committee written <br />report. If you have any questions or comments on that at this time. <br />MS. GARSON: <br /> Actually, so you passed out the report, again, the next agenda it will be <br />the discussion of that report. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> Bill, do you have any comments on the meetings? <br />MR. TAKABA: <br /> No. I think you did a good job on the report. And Glen too. It’s fine. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> Let’s move on to the next committee report, Revenue Enhancement. <br />Before we move on, I don’t remember in categories of our committee, it says <br />operations, budget, policy and consolidation. I don’t remember, although it is in the <br />minutes, that policy was part of it. And it seems like a lot to have four different <br />categories although they’re intertwined. <br />MS. GARSON: <br /> When you get to six and your discussion of approach, if you want to <br />tweak the committee, we’ll discuss it. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> Okay, thank you. <br />B.Revenue Enhancement and Collections (K. Armour, P. Provalenko) <br />MS. WONG: <br /> The next committee report, Revenue Enhancement and Collections, Ken <br />and Patricia. <br />MR. ARMOUR: <br /> We did not have an opportunity to meet so therefore we don’t have a <br />report for today’s meeting. We’re scheduled to meet right after this meeting. <br />C.Technology Recommendations and Adoption (E. O’Hara, M. Nicholson) <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.