My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-09-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
2010-09-10 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 1:09:39 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:09:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DISCUSSION REGARDING RECOMMENDATIONS OF PREVOUS COST OF <br />GOVERNMENT COMMISSIONS <br />MS. GARSON: <br /> I believe this item is on the agenda because one of the board members <br />had asked if which of the last commission recommendations had been implemented or <br />followed up on. And I personally did it. And the answer to that question is would be for, <br />would the commission like to send a communication to all of the departments asking <br />them what happened to all of the recommendations from the last commission. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> And it was me that asked that question and I thought it was going to be <br />answered today but since it’s not, I’ll jump to another topic that I had – maybe since the <br />mayor, maybe we might invite the mayor and ask him what he would like from the <br />commission or what has been recommendations that were taken, if that’s appropriate. <br />MS. GARSON: <br /> Actually Mr. Takaba is here really representing that administration. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> Okay. <br />MS. WONG: <br /> And it’s been expressed on the core. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> It seems to me there are two ways we could handle this. We could <br />either go back to departments and write a letter saying these were the <br />recommendations from this report, maybe we want to go to both reports or just the most <br />recent, please address how your department implemented these and if not why, or <br />explanation. We could either do it that way or now that we have decided to divide to <br />divide into these three teams, each team could go through those reports and see what <br />was relevant to their topic and follow up if that seems appropriate. <br />MS. PROVALENKO: <br /> I’d prefer just going back to the previous commission’s <br />recommendations and asking each department to respond back with what they did or <br />why they didn’t do it, and get that feedback. I like that one better. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Any other comments? <br />MS. WONG: <br /> You’re saying through a letter? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> Let’s talk about the purpose of this. How are we going to use that <br />information? <br />MS. WONG: <br /> And the reason I ask that was before I even started, my concern was, if <br />we make a recommendation, is anybody going to do anything with it? And did they do <br />anything before, would kind of indicate if they’ll do anything with our recommendations. <br />But when you really think of it, it really doesn’t matter if they didn’t do it before, that’s <br />history. If we make good enough recommendations that they can buy into and the <br />county administration buys into it, our job will have been done, that we made the <br />recommendations and hopefully they will seek the value of that. So, my question is not <br />greatly necessary. I would have appreciated to be encouraged that what we’re doing <br />will be enacted upon. But this morning I was thinking, rereading this agenda item, why <br />was this commission really formed? What was the purpose? Is it really necessary, <br />28 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.