Laserfiche WebLink
MS. O’HARA: <br />Mmhmmm. <br />MS. GARSON: <br />Sure, I mean that’s not a problem because we’re going to discuss Gloria’s <br />handout at the next meeting so if it’s part of the draft… <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />I guess my question to the rest of the commissioners isdoes this seem like a <br />reasonable way to approach the report? Basically have a part 1 that is a overview of what we <br />have discussed and some county level specific recommendations that we have come up with, <br />and then part 2 will be department specific, and then part three will contain a lot of the <br />recommendations that we received through the employee survey that are not department <br />specific but very employee specific type of recommendations. Does that seem like a reasonable <br />way to organize the report? <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />It seems reasonable to me. I guess my only concern is someone who is <br />maybe in Public Works will just flip to the Public Works and look at that section. <br />MR. MATSUDA: <br />Only. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />Bill, what do you think about the way this is organized? <br />MR. TAKABA: <br />I’m thinking that there is going to be overlap with the employee section and <br />the department specific section where an employee might be talking about the Police <br />Department.Because these are our recommendations right? It seems like you go department <br />by department but you start with the overall I guess and then you can go department by <br />department and somewhere if you want to indicate that it came from an employee or the <br />department itself or whatever that might be okay but… <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> A lot of the recommendations that we got from the employees were not <br />department specific. They were more about compensation packages and… <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />There were some that were department specific. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br />There were. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br /> But for the most part they were not. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> And I think we have gone through and tried to identify those that were <br />department specific versus those that were just general to do with employee situation at the <br />county. <br />MS. NICHOLSON: <br />So by saying employee specific recommendations we’re not saying or <br />implying these were all recommendations that came from employees butmaybe they are <br />relating to employment…. Maybe we should call it something else. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> Okay, gotcha. <br />MR. TAKABA: <br />Okay, maybe I misunderstood it. <br />MS. O’HARA: <br /> How about employment specific? <br />23 <br /> <br />