Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Stremski noted on page 2 the recommendation to establish a two -week lag in payroll. <br />She believed they had earlier discussed that a five -day lag would be efficient. Ms. Nicholson <br />said that would be one of their Civil Service items. <br />Ms. Garson said that the Finance Department was who initially brought up the payroll lag <br />and that the COGC would need to discuss it with Civil Service. There are federal laws that <br />require payment of wages to be done in a certain time frame and other issues that Civil Service <br />would be more equipped to address. <br />The Chair said that the COGC did have the pay lag as a recommendation previously, and <br />he believed it was a one -week lag. However, the degree of the lag could be reviewed later. Mr. <br />Sakaguchi stated that the State has a two -week lag. The Chair said they had recommended one <br />week, because otherwise everybody would have to go two weeks without a pay check to <br />establish the lag. Ms. Garson said the lag could be almost four weeks for a brand new employee. <br />Motion: Ms. Nicholson moved to accept and include in the COGC's recommendations <br />the recommendation in the DEM's letter that payroll forms be reviewed for possible <br />consolidation. The Chair said he thought they already had that as a recommendation. Ms. <br />Garson requested that the secretary from now on keep a running list of recommendations that can <br />be passed out at each meeting. The Chair said that for today they would go ahead with the <br />motion. Ms. Stremski seconded the motion. <br />Vote: The Chair called for a vote, and all members voted aye. <br />Ms. Nicholson questioned whether at an earlier meeting they had made a <br />recommendation regarding an additional engineer. The Chair said their motion was to explore <br />the position and at the same time have a long -term plan to fund it, because the problem was they <br />did not have an established budget and did not know if they could fund an engineer in the long <br />term. The COGC wanted the DEM to have a long -term plan so they could justify and establish <br />that position. <br />Ms. Garson stated she had a list of their recommendations as of April 6, 2006: Stop <br />having automatic payment water bills come with return envelopes; the Finance Department is to <br />expedite sale of County -owned lands; combine the water and sewer bills into one bill; have water <br />turn -off for overdue sewer bill customers; training on legal issues for all departmental <br />management; and creating an incentive program for employees. <br />Ms. Nicholson said she thought they had included the Computerized Maintenance <br />Management System in their recommendations. The Chair said he believed Mr. Sakaguchi had <br />made a motion on that, but they could do it now, just in case. <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Nicholson moved to include in their report a recommendation <br />that the DEM acquire the Computerized Maintenance Management System, Mr. Sakaguchi <br />seconded the motion, and all members voted aye. <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Nicholson moved to file the communication, Ms. Stremski <br />seconded the motion, and all members voted aye. <br />7 <br />