Laserfiche WebLink
24. DISCUSSION /ACTION ON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT <br />COMMISSION RESPONSE TO THE COMMISSION'S LETTER DATED <br />APRIL 10, 2006 <br />Ms. Nicholson said she did not understand the second bullet under 1, about recruiting <br />employees by way of outsourcing projects. Mr. Sakaguchi said he believed the issue was to <br />explore the feasibility, if they can't recruit, of outsourcing a whole project, such as hiring a <br />company in California to design a sewage system for us. <br />The commissioners discussed that the communication was not clear about what it meant <br />in terms of recruiting employees. Ms. Nicholson said they should not take action because the <br />issue is not clear. They could, however, discuss the issue of outsourcing projects rather than <br />hiring employees and that would possibly be another item for their Civil Service list. Ms. <br />Garson stated that the DEM already has the authority for privatization, and Mr. Dworsky and <br />Ms. Bell had stated that the DEM already does quite a bit of that. <br />Ms. Nicholson asked whether there is a difference between using an outside consultant <br />and outsourcing an entire project. Ms. Garson said that commonly a consultant would be hired <br />to do a design, and then would stay on through the construction project, as project manager. The <br />Chair said projects do get outsourced, but they have to go through the whole Council process, <br />which takes a long time but is thorough. Mr. Sakaguchi said it takes time to gather all the <br />reviews, but if that was not done the County could be exposed to liability. The Chair said they <br />don't want to go with something that is obsolete or not suitable for Hawaii. <br />Motion and Vote: Ms. Nicholson moved to file the communication, Ms. Provalenko <br />seconded the motion, and all members voted aye. <br />19. DISCUSSION /ACTION ON PLANNING DEPARTMENT RESPONSE TO THE <br />COMMISSION'S LETTER DATED APRIL 10, 2006 <br />Ms. Garson said that the Planning Department is next on the priority list, and so they <br />might want to decide what they would like to ask the director about. <br />Mr. Sakaguchi said that they received a report from another department on how much <br />land the County owns, but when he looked at Mr. Yuen's response, he said the Planning <br />Department's main job is to manage land use. He wanted to know if that meant managing <br />County land, or land that is in Hawaii County. Ms. Garson said it means land within Hawaii <br />County. Mr. Sakaguchi asked what the State Land Use Commission deals with. Ms. Garson <br />explained that there is a two - tiered system. The State Land Use Commission has categorized all <br />the land in the State. Each County also has its own land use regulations, which are superimposed <br />upon the State's regulations. They might be conflicting, so in order to go forward with <br />something, both the State and County need to have the correct land use designation. <br />Mr. Sakaguchi questioned why both systems were needed and said the law should be <br />changed because it causes so much confusion, and the public interest may not be upheld by <br />having all of this. The Chair said that the Land Use Commission is for zoning —that if you <br />