My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-06 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2007
>
2006-04-06 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 8:33:02 AM
Creation date
6/21/2011 1:13:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Bell stated that she was unclear on what the COGC's "process" was and asked how <br />big a picture it was going to look at, i.e., state -wide or county -wide, and whether the <br />COGC makes recommendations for the Council to adopt. <br />Ms. Garson explained that the COGC looks at the various County departments and <br />boards and generates a report for the Mayor and Council. <br />Ms. Nicholson told Ms. Bell that the COGC was there to help her. <br />Ms. Bell stated that the DEM is the newest County department and that she sometimes <br />sees it as "the little birds begging for worms." She passed out a handout which she <br />explained was originally for a power -point demonstration, but that it gave a good <br />overview of the department. She said the DEM is a spin -off of the Department of Public <br />Works and that it includes a Solid Waste Division and Wastewater Division. She is the <br />first director of the DEM and started in August, 2002, and it took about one and a half <br />years to get to the point where they were functioning as intended. The DEM consists of <br />the Solid Waste Division/Fund, the Wastewater Division/Sewer Fund, the Abandoned <br />Vehicle Program /Disposal Fund, as well as a Technical Services Section and Business <br />Services Section. <br />Ms. Bell introduced Robin Bauman as the "top fiscal person" and Nelson Ho, the deputy <br />director. She said that Mr. Ho handles the Wastewater Division and personnel issues, <br />and she handles the Solid Waste Division and the budget. <br />She stated that in the Solid Waste Division, there are two landfills that are open, 365 days <br />a year, and three that are closed. There are 12 recycling centers, 10 bottle bill places, 80 <br />employees, and 36 Department of Health permits. <br />She said that the work on steepening the landfill slope involves one big permit with the <br />Department of Health and that the permit application is in a four -inch binder. She said a <br />lot of lead time is needed for planning and that 55 contractors are involved for <br />operational services or as consultants. She said that the DEM probably privatizes more <br />than any other department. All the recycling is privately done, as the County does not <br />directly provide those services. There are numerous contracts for engineering consultants <br />and environmental assessments, etc. <br />She stated that a major policy assumption is that residential trash is not charged directly <br />at the transfer station, that instead it is paid indirectly via peoples' property taxes every <br />year. There are budget requests to keep the DEM in compliance with all of its permits. <br />They never receive all that they ask for, but they need it to be on the record each year. <br />The DEM knows what it takes to be totally legal. <br />Regarding recycling, a very small amount of County funds is put into it. It is funded <br />mainly through federal and state grants, and the DEM is always on the lookout for grants. <br />The next page of Ms. Bell's handout was a summary of numbers to show the Council, to <br />explain where the DEM's revenue comes from. She explained that when the federal <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.