Laserfiche WebLink
120 P.3d 217 Page 3 <br />108 Hawai'i 318, 120 P.3d 217 <br />(Cite as: 108 Hawai'i 318, 120 P.3d 217) <br />92XXVI(E)9 Elections, Voting, and Politi-ceeding 10 percent threshold above which an equal <br />cal Rights protection violation may arise. U.S.C.A. <br />92k3656 Equality of Voting Power Const.Amend. 14. <br />(One Person, One Vote) <br />92k3659 k. Bodies, Officers, and <br />[11] Constitutional Law 923658(6) <br />Elections Subject to Limitations. Most Cited Cases <br /> (Formerly 92k225.3(11)) <br />92 Constitutional Law <br />92XXVI Equal Protection <br />The general principle of population equality in <br />92XXVI(E) Particular Issues and Applica- <br />apportionment of voting districts, guaranteed by the <br />tions <br />federal equal protection clause, applies to local elec- <br />92XXVI(E)9 Elections, Voting, and Politi- <br />tions. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 14. <br />cal Rights <br />92k3656 Equality of Voting Power <br />[9] Constitutional Law 92 3658(6) <br />(One Person, One Vote) <br />92k3658 Electoral Districts <br />92k3658(6) k. Population Devia- <br />92 Constitutional Law <br />tion. Most Cited Cases <br />92XXVI Equal Protection <br /> (Formerly 92k225.3(6)) <br />92XXVI(E) Particular Issues and Applica- <br />tions <br />92XXVI(E)9 Elections, Voting, and Politi- <br /> Counties 104 38 <br /> <br />cal Rights <br />92k3656 Equality of Voting Power <br />104 Counties <br />(One Person, One Vote) <br />104II Government <br />92k3658 Electoral Districts <br />104II(C) County Board <br />92k3658(6) k. Population Devia- <br />104k38 k. Nature and Constitution in Gen- <br />tion. Most Cited Cases <br />eral.Most Cited Cases <br /> (Formerly 92k225.3(6)) <br />Total deviation of 10.89 percent in county com- <br />Total deviation in excess of 10 percent in elec- <br />mission's reapportionment of county council districts <br />toral reapportionment plan presents prima facie case <br />did not violate equal protection, despite commission's <br />of discrimination in violation of federal equal protec- <br />erroneous inclusion of nonresident students and mili- <br />. <br />tion clause. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 14 <br />tary personnel and their dependents in population <br />base, where deviation was only slightly over 10 per- <br />[10] Constitutional Law 92 3658(6) <br />cent threshold which would comport with equal pro- <br />tection guarantee, and by using total, as opposed to <br />resident, population base, commission evidenced <br />92 Constitutional Law <br />intent to achieve inclusiveness and equal representa- <br />92XXVI Equal Protection <br />tion. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 14. <br />92XXVI(E) Particular Issues and Applica- <br />tions <br />92XXVI(E)9 Elections, Voting, and Politi- <br />[12] Appeal and Error 30 167 <br /> <br />cal Rights <br />92k3656 Equality of Voting Power <br />30 Appeal and Error <br />(One Person, One Vote) <br />30IV Right of Review <br />92k3658 Electoral Districts <br />30IV(B) Estoppel, Waiver, or Agreements <br />92k3658(6) k. Population Devia- <br />Affecting Right <br />tion. Most Cited Cases <br />30k167 k. Agreements and Stipulations. <br /> (Formerly 92k225.3(6)) <br />Most Cited Cases <br />Rational government policy will justify total de- <br />On appeal from trial court's judgment in favor of <br />viation in apportioning voting districts slightly ex- <br />county in action challenging validity of reapportion- <br />© 2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. <br /> <br />