My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Communication 07 Supreme Court Opinion
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Communications
>
Communication 07 Supreme Court Opinion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2011 9:10:41 AM
Creation date
6/24/2011 9:10:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
120 P.3d 217 Page 5 <br />108 Hawai'i 318, 120 P.3d 217 <br />(Cite as: 108 Hawai'i 318, 120 P.3d 217) <br />Puna, one from the judicial district of <br />Kau, one from the combined judicial dis- <br /> (4) Districts shall have approximately <br />tricts of North and South Kona, one from <br />equal resident populations as required by <br />the combined judicial districts of North <br />applicable constitutional provisions. <br />and South Kohala, and one from the judi- <br />cial district of Hamakua. The members <br />(g) The district boundaries as established <br />shall be appointed by the mayor and con- <br />by the reapportionment commission shall <br />firmed by the council in the manner pre- <br />be in effect at the first regularly scheduled <br />scribed in section 13-4. <br />council election following the filing of the <br />plan and for any subsequent council elec- <br />(c)Each subsequent reapportionment <br />tion. The district boundaries in effect prior <br />commission shall consist of nine mem- <br />to the filing of the reapportionment plan <br />bers. One member shall be a resident of <br />shall remain in effect during the duration <br />each council district as established by the <br />of the term of all councilmembers elected <br />previous reapportionment commission. <br />or appointed to represent such districts un- <br />The members shall be appointed by the <br />til the expiration of the full term of such <br />mayor and confirmed by the council in the <br />councilmembers, including any election <br />manner prescribed in section 13-4. <br />held to fill an unexpired term under sec- <br />tion 3-4. <br />(d) The year 1991 and every tenth year <br />thereafter shall be reapportionment years. <br />Charter of the County of Hawaii § 3-17 <br />The reapportionment commission shall be <br />(1990) (emphases added). <br />appointed and confirmed by March 1 of <br />the reapportionment year, and shall file a <br />Subsequent to the filing of the Commission's <br />reapportionment plan with the county <br />plan, Plaintiffs-Appellants Citizens for Equitable and <br />clerk by December 31 of the reapportion- <br />Responsible Government, Brenda J. Ford, Stanley A. <br />ment year. <br />Boren, Floyd H. Lundquist, Marlene E. Lundquist, <br />Ronald C. Phillips, (collectively, Appellants) and <br />(e) The county clerk shall furnish all nec- <br />Plaintiffs-Appellees Beverly Byouk and Sandra W. <br />essary technical and secretarial services <br />Scarr filed a Complaint and First Amended Com- <br />for the reapportionment commission. The <br />plaint against County of Hawai‘i and other Defen- <br />council shall appropriate necessary funds <br />dants-Appellees, the County Clerk, Hawai‘i County <br />to enable the commission to carry out its <br />and Llyod Van De Car, Chairman of the Commission <br />duties. <br />(collectively, County Appellees) in the third circuit <br />FN2 <br /> requesting, inter alia, a declara- <br />court (the court) <br />(f) The reapportionment commission shall tory ruling that the Commission's plan was invalid. <br />be guided by the following criteria in es- <br />tablishing the boundaries of the council <br />FN2. The Honorable Riki May Amano pre- <br />districts: <br />sided. <br />(1) No district shall be drawn to unduly <br />Appellants moved for partial summary judgment <br />favor or penalize a person or political fac- <br />on the ground the Commission used the wrong popu- <br />tion; <br />lation base and that, therefore, the Commission's plan <br />was unconstitutional because its total deviation from <br />(2) Insofar as possible, districts should be the ideal mean exceeded 10%. Appellants appended <br />contiguous and compact; to their motion for summary judgment a letter dated <br />October 25, 1989, written by Christopher J. Yuen <br />(Yuen), the attorney representing the Commission <br />(3) District lines shall, where possible, <br />during the drafting of the reapportionment plan, for <br />follow permanent and easily recognizable <br />the proposition that the Commission was advised to <br />features; <br />use the same population base as used by the State <br />© 2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.