My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-06-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-06-08 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2011 12:52:14 PM
Creation date
6/28/2011 12:51:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
particular parcel of land has never been fully investigated. I just wanted to make sure <br />that in the issue of forced removal, there has been the use of even SWAT teams and <br />what not, to remove Hawaiians from their land. And I just wanted to let you know, I <br />have this letter from the Department of Justice from Washington. So they want a full <br />report on any native tenants who have been forcibly removed either by tasering or <br />excessive force from their native tenant property. Because in Hawai‘i’s own statutes <br />like HRS 17211, even if the land was alienated, the rights of the native tenants still <br />adhered. So I’m just pleading so far as the consolidation of tax efforts and enforcement <br />that they really need to review the laws, all laws that have to do with native tenants and <br />Hawaiians who have the right of those properties, but they may or may not be taxable. I <br />wasn’t aware that the Hawai‘i Revised Statute is actually based on Hawai‘i Statutes. <br />And according to Judge Ezra, that the law of the land even the law of the land what the <br />police are supposed to enforce actually has to do with Kingdom law. So that those <br />particular laws are still on the books and have been revised. They actually are all <br />based, if you look at your HRS’s which the county is akin to the state. They’re actually a <br />corporation, municipal corporation of the state. <br />Now, the next one is general government activities and what not. You may have heard <br />that in other counties that the Hawaiians are actually bringing forth an effort to serve <br />their determination. And in other counties, they have actually extended an effort to <br />meet with the Hawaiians and to work something out. And so I’m pleading with you here <br />today to look at the issue that was brought forth, actually from the White House under <br />Title VI, that the Hawaiians do have the right to self determination. But as I mentioned <br />before they’re very interested in the county services. But as I mentioned to Mr. Oshiro <br />the county need to be retrofitted and the people informed of actual laws that would bind <br />the county to allow for self determination, maintain services and in a nonchaotic <br />manner. And just to let you know, I have been appointed by a federal agent. Actually I <br />have a badge and what not, but to protect the native tenants along the trails particularly <br />in the County of Hawai‘i. So, I’m here to, I have training in culture resource <br />management. So, a lot of these issues, it’s a matter of Memorandum of Agreement that <br />you can make. I was informed that the mayor has the right to put stuff forward to do <br />that so that the county, in particular, can save itself a lot of grief and lawsuits and all <br />these other things that might be coming down even so far as Geneva IV and human <br />rights violations and other things. In particular that the county and the state are both <br />bound to what’s called the Statehood Admission Act. And especially in the judicial <br />system that they must uphold the rights and protect the Hawaiian culture and their <br />religion. They must not cause them to diminish. And if they do Congress could sue the <br />State of Hawai‘i and remove their statehood. And as we speak right now, there have <br />actually been a lot of violations that have already occurred. That doesn’t mean to say <br />that the county cannot start asserting itself into proper ethical, moral function and try to <br />work out these efforts in an internal way, to reach out to the Hawaiians and make a <br />better working arrangement even from within the county works and what not. <br />The other thing, public safety, that in particular does happen to do with this letter from <br />Washington. And so that they want dates of assaults, sequence of events, names of <br />police officers, reports involving what you call federal criminal civil rights violations. So, <br />basically they’re not supposed to be under Title 42 that the Hawaiians have rights under <br />customs and usage. And I know that they made the defendant to be called citizens <br />because the apology geared to overturn all that. They don’t want to be called citizens. <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.