My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-11-09 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular mc
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2003-2005
>
2005-11-09 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular mc
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:01:07 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:55:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DE LIMA: -- refunded- <br />WJ: - -and all contributions returned, I would like to make a motion to put this <br />matter to rest. <br />CHAIR KK: You are—what's the word to use? <br />DE LIMA: You can issue an informal advisory opinion consistent with the findings that <br />have been presented today. <br />PKO: Find no violation, is that what you're saying? Under these circumstances? <br />WJ: Under these circumstances. <br />PKO: If he returns the money- <br />WJ: - -being that the legal defense fund is being dissolved, all the funds are being <br />returned to the <br />DE L IMA: -- contributors. <br />WJ: -- contributors. I think, I think this matter should <br />CHAIR KK: Do we understand the motion now? Are we clear, for the record? <br />PKO: I'm going to write an informal advisory opinion. <br />CHAIR KK: Do we have an understanding— common understanding of the motion? All <br />those in favor, say aye. <br />WJ: Aye. <br />KI: Aye. <br />CHAIR KK: Chair votes aye. <br />DE LIMA: Thank you for your time. <br />CHAIR KK: Thank you. <br />CHAIR RW: I'll resume my role as Chair, and we move to item —we're returning to the <br />original agenda, get back on New Business, item 4a, Petition 2005 -04, Richard <br />Ganigan seeks an opinion regarding an alleged conflict of interest involving <br />CDL training and promoting employees within the Department of Public <br />Works. Now at this point, they have requested that we go into Executive <br />Session. Now a request for hearing was referred to Executive Session. Is there <br />a motion that we move into Executive Session for this issue? <br />PKO: Can I review your rules? <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.