My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-11-09 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular mc
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2003-2005
>
2005-11-09 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular mc
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:01:07 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:55:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
relevant. If the Court feels it's not relevant, that's fine. Okay, but I'm not here <br />to always come to a debate with either the Board or with Mr. Ganigan, because <br />I really want to get down to the facts of the case, and that's why I brought <br />Hiram here, to talk about the facts. That's why I filed a declaration from Harry <br />Jose, to give you the facts of the case. Now I want to see what kind of facts <br />Mr. Ganigan has to make his claims. That's what I'm here for. I'm only <br />asking questions that I think is relevant. Whatever the Board feels has <br />, that's fine. <br />PKO: I think Mr. Kawahara interrupted, because if you were going to talk about his <br />medical condition, he might want to reconsider whether it's open or closed. <br />KK: Yes. <br />CHAIR: Right. <br />PKO: That's the only. <br />WJ: But I don't think that's relevant, not a decision. <br />PKO: You know frankly, I still don't understand what the claim is, the ethical side. <br />KAMELAMELA: Yeah, I mean- <br />WJ: - -I think I see it in 2 -83, section (b), no officer or employee shall use or attempt <br />to use the officer's or employee's official position to secure or grant <br />unwarranted privileges, exemptions, advantages, contracts, or treatment. And I <br />think that's what I'm looking at <br />PKO: - -So who are you <br />WJ: - -I think he's been explaining that, that this gentleman on his own time was <br />training people for positions that were within his employment, that could gain <br />employment, and that he's employed as a County worker to train these people <br />during County time, and he's been using his own free time and charging <br />people on his own free time to train people for what they should be learning for <br />free through the County, then there is a violation. I mean, I see it. <br />CHAIR: Yeah, we're just not that far yet. We kind of want to get to that. <br />WJ: That's all I'm interested in at this point. <br />CHAIR: I see a lot of financial absenteeism ( ?), I see , perhaps, some valid, <br />some not valid, and so on. These are things that are way beyond the purview <br />of this Board, clearly, you know. But I kind of want—we want to zero in on <br />this ethical thing, and soI don't know, Mr. Kamelamela, do you want to <br />pursue this line further? I mean, I think- <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.