Laserfiche WebLink
KAMELAMELA: - -I got to that point, and I have more questions, because to me, he made his <br />complaint. I'm trying to find out precisely what is it he's complaining about, <br />not what we might think he's complaining about. But the more information I <br />think we have, the better decision we can make that is fair to everybody. <br />WJ: I don't think knowing about his past work history is going to help me make a <br />determination- <br />KAMELAMELA: - -on what- <br />WJ: - -so if you want to ask him specific questions as to his ethical violation, I think <br />that's very appropriate. <br />KAMELAMELA: Yeah, but so far I haven't heard really anything, and that's what I'm trying to <br />find out. So, Mr. Joseph, if you want to stop me from questioning, that's fine. <br />But I have a duty to my client to ask what I feel is relevant. <br />WJ: I'd like to stay with your relevancy. And I read to you the portion that he <br />claims. And it's a serious allegation. <br />KAMELAMELA: Yeah, and I'm not treating this any more less seriously, Mr. Joseph. <br />WJ: No, but could you better ask the questions specifically to that allegation? <br />KAMELAMELA: And that's where I'm going. <br />PKO: You know, maybe we didn't allow you a chance to make an opening statement, <br />to give us an overview of what your case is. Would that be helpful in <br />understanding the line of questioning? We gave you a chance to try and <br />explain <br />GANIGAN: -- but he kept butting in. <br />CHAIR: I want to get him to do that, too, and then that's what we would dig into a little <br />but, you know, a little cross - examination as it were, right? I kind of what to <br />hear what you guys have to say to these charges <br />KAMELAMELA: What I did to try state the case is, I filed a pre- hearing statement which <br />outlines not only what the relevant Code of Ethics provision is, and I think I <br />filed it with the Board in November—November 4t it went out. So that's <br />what I did to give what the law is and give what the facts of the case is. <br />Because I wasn't too sure what Mr. Ganigan was going to bring up, you know, <br />I'm trying to . But it is within the power of the Board that if <br />they want me to proceed to another area, I can. It's not a problem with me, <br />because now I'm going into another area, another area of questioning. But this <br />is how I see the case. So by looking at my pre- hearing statement, and listening <br />to what Ganigan had stated, what I wanted to tell the Board is this, that the <br />County shouldn't penalize its employees for one, for people wanting to <br />W <br />