2006-02-08 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular

Home

KI: I agree with you in how you feel. I agree with you. However, I don't think this is the avenue right now to take care of that problem. I would be frustrated, too, but this is not that avenue. KK: Do you all belong to the same union? GILMAN: The same union. KK: And the avenue - -you have resorted to the union's machinery for, to determine your, you know, case? CAMBRA: Yes, like I was trying to say earlier about the union decision. It did come to the union, and I believe there's a settlement came out of it that I learned of last week, was it the 3rd or the 4th, and I don't know the details of it, but I know part of the details is that they did stop auditing, or he won't be giving the performance test anymore on the issue, on this issue. You know, I just found it outlast week. What I was getting at is what happened before that, prior to that, in May of 2004, when I went up for a promotion, you know. And I feel if this thing was caught and solved then, you know, it wouldn't have come to this point where a violation or not. KK: Would you apply again? CAMBRA: Yes, I would. KAMELAMELA: Again, I think that the union settlement, because it's not a part to be decided on, because I can also tell him that the Mayor didn't sign the agreement yet, so— so there is no agreement, until the Mayor—so I could just but we shouldn't be going there. PKO: Okay, so maybe if they are finished presenting whatever they feel they need to present, we could move on to the other side. I don't know if they're done, but CAMBRA: I'm done with mine. PKO: You're done with yours. And how about you, Mr. Gilman? GILMAN: I would like to know why Brandon Nahale pulled his papers. What did he say? PKO: Why did the other petitioner withdraw- GILMAN: It's in here, he was—he pulled his papers, and it says feel free to call me for any questions. WJ: That's beyond our KI: - -yeah, we don't have that. All we have is a letter saying that he's pulling his papers out. 19