My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-02-08 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2006-02-08 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:02:03 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AL: Indirect interest. <br />ONIZUKA: Yes. <br />ASHIDA: That is a very good question, because that's really at the heart of any issue that <br />would be relevant. I think I've stated our position in my letter dated January 4, <br />that I think the proper analysis is looking at the degree of . Because I <br />think if you take anything to its logical extreme, you could say that I'm related to <br />you, Ms. Lum, somehow, down the road, you know <br />AL: - -six degrees of separation? <br />ASHIDA: I think what you should look at are factual considerations. I'm glad Mr. Onizuka, <br />you know, came here today from Kona to answer your questions, because I think <br />the factual questions like Mr. Inouye had very, very important and relevant. What <br />exactly do you do there, you know? Do you have any say in the day -to -day <br />operations with respect to that liquor license? You know, so, I think that it's a <br />matter of degree. It's a matter of what you collectively as a group feel more <br />confident in. Again, that's our position. You have your attorney here who you <br />know, can - -if you have any specific questions about that, you can address it with <br />her. Ms. Pakele looks like she just needs to say something, so. <br />PAKELE: I do. 1250 Oceanside, is who is the employer of Claude Onizuka, is the lessor to <br />our licensee, which is the Club at Hokulia, which is a non - profit entity. Direct <br />interests would be whether or not Mr. Onizuka influences the day -to -day <br />operations. The indirect, as I see it, would be whether or not 1250 can influence <br />the Club at Hokulia in its operations, in its operations involving liquor. As I see <br />it, Mr. Onizuka is not an officer or director of 1250 Oceanside Partners and by his <br />statement does not have anything to do with the actual liquor service involved in <br />the premises. Does that— <br />AL: - -that helps. <br />ASHIDA: I'm going to hire Ms. Pakele as our next lawyer in our office. <br />KK: Any other questions? Mr. Joseph? <br />WJ: I think my only question would be, if an issue should arise from the Clubhouse to <br />the Liquor Commission, what would then be your position? <br />ONIZUKA: Well I think if it involved anything to do with the Club at Hokulia, then I would <br />excuse myself from that case. <br />WJ: Thank you. <br />AL: Or anything else to do with that whole development, right? <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.