My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-02-08 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2006-02-08 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:02:03 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KK: What is the pleasure of the Board? <br />WJ: I'd like to hear the first petitions prior to hearing Mr. Ganigan's. <br />KK: So we go in the order that it's stated here? <br />WJ: That's my preference. <br />KK: Mr. Inouye, do you have any preference? <br />KI: Let's go ahead. <br />KK: Go ahead with the way we have it on the agenda? Ms. Lum? <br />AL: That's fine, the agenda's fine. <br />KK: Okay. So we'll just go ahead with the order as it is —the order of business as it is <br />stated. So item b under New Business, Petition No. 2005 -09, Robert Cambra <br />seeks an opinion regarding alleged unfair treatment and conflict of interest <br />involving training and promoting of employees within the Department of Public <br />Works. Could the respective members please have a seat. Would you introduce <br />yourself? We know who Mr. Kamelamela is, but the others, just to familiarize <br />ourselves again. <br />CAMBRA: I'm Robert Cambra. I work for the County Roads <br />KK: Robert Cambra. <br />PKO: Robert Cambra. <br />CAMBRA: I'm Robert Cambra. I work for the County Roads in the Waimea Division. <br />KAMELAMELA: I'm Joseph Kamelamela, representing Hiram Keliikoa and Stan Nakasone. I <br />had a request. Because the complaint seemed to be stating, like Robert Cambra's <br />and Mr. Gilman's, should we just do it at one time? Because at this point it would <br />be the same, and I think it seems a good way to do this- <br />KK: Is Mr. Gilman here? Is Mr. Gilman here? <br />KAMELAMELA: Yes. <br />KK: Is there any objections to hearing both? Hearing none, then- <br />PKO: - -I think you should ask Mr. Cambra and Gilman if they object. If they don't <br />object, I don't see a problem. <br />KK: Have you discussed this prior? No? Do you have any objections? <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.