Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Ethics <br />Minutes of Regular Session <br />March 14, 2007 <br />used to be and it is easier access. The gift disclosures are upstairs, and sometimes we have <br />reporters come and ask for copies of those. <br />WJ: That is something we get to look at right? <br />BLT: Yeah, we get to look at gift disclosures. There is a difference I noticed on the <br />state level. There are a lot more things that go through the State Ethics Commission. Like the <br />ones that are filed with the County Clerk are filed with the Ethics Commission on the State level; <br />both the public and the confidential ones. I think the reason that they set it up here with the <br />Clerk is that the Clerk is there everyday and they are generally the keeper of official information <br />and it was easier to have people go to the Clerks office to get copies of material rather than go to <br />Corporation Counsel. So you have one repository for the public stuff. I think they also keep <br />copies of the gift disclosures. <br />WJ: Is there any further comments on this? <br />JD: BJ, so in terms of text revisions to the code, only that note referring to Section 13- <br />10 is the only addition? <br />BLT: Yeah, from the last version. Now I need to clean up the typos and play with the <br />font. We were waiting to see if the Council would amend the list of people who have to file. So <br />I have been playing with it. Should it be "see the list," or my preference is probably to plug in <br />the names of boards and commissions that are required to file. <br />AL: I like that, but then that means if it gets revised we need to remember to revise it. <br />BLT: Then I started dating each edition. It is such a hard time on the computer ... <br />Draft 1, Draft 2, what date was that? So today's draft on the computer is the 3 -14 -07 draft. <br />AL: My favorite part of this is the Ethics Checklist. I really like it. That is really a <br />friendly document. It seems to hit the ordinary things people are going to be up against. <br />KS: It is an interactive, and I want to know if .... do we, can we discuss at this point <br />the procedure or the process of this from new employee through Human Resources. <br />BLT: I think that is a legitimate discussion. The whole point of us coming up with this <br />is to insure that it gets disseminated to newly elected officers, new department heads, and new <br />employees. <br />KS: Are you, should we write a draft procedure so that the people that need to sign on <br />to this, perhaps Human Resources, the department heads, because other people are going to be <br />responsible for this full activity. I am sure there will have to be some negotiation from you to <br />them, like "What, another piece of paper? No way." So that we can give it to the Council as here <br />is a brief procedure which could be implemented department wide ... <br />5 <br />