My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-06-25 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2008-06-25 Board of Ethics Minutes Regular Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:07:39 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:56:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LUM: So we will have to agendize our —we will have to start our rule amending, our- <br />SCHOEN: - -So for the next board meeting, what I can do is —I think maybe two <br />meetings ago we discussed --I think Mr. Joseph had asked that I provide State rules regarding <br />administrative fines and so I can do that, send you folks a copy of that so we can have that <br />discussion about rules for the next meeting. <br />CHAIR: Okay, great. You guys have any more questions regarding Bill 209? <br />LUM: No. <br />CHAIR: Okay you want to move on to item c. <br />c. Report from counsel on the possible pursuit of an amendment to Section 2 -85(b) of <br />the Hawaii County Code regarding the prohibition of contracting with former <br />employees and retirees. <br />SCHOEN: Mr. Chair item c is a report from me regarding a possible amendment of <br />Section 2 -85(b) of our Hawai `i County Code. I don't have anything to report today. I need a <br />continuance, and so 1 would ask that this matter be placed on the next board agenda for <br />discussion. <br />LUM: Wasn't that one just because the wording was strange? <br />NICHOLSON: Yes. <br />SCHOEN: That is - -but you folks wanted a little bit more detailed explanation as to why <br />that was a problem, and I haven't done it so I'm not prepared to discuss it today. My apologies <br />to the board. <br />time. <br />CHAIR: We need a motion to continue that? <br />SCHOEN: No, I think it's fine that the Chair directs that we put it on the agenda for next <br />d. Ongoing discussion on the Sunshine Law. <br />CHAIR: Okay, what about item d. Is that going to have to continue over as well? <br />SCHOEN: Yeah, we can keep that on if you want. I don't have any sunshine discussion. <br />CHAIR: Unless you guys have any questions? <br />LUM and NICHOLSON (simultaneously): No. <br />CHAIR: Okay, neither do 1. Okay, that being said, if I can get a motion to move into <br />executive session. <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.