Laserfiche WebLink
COLE: No, I did not. <br />CHAIR: Okay. Can we get one to him? <br />(Mr. Cole was handed a copy of Mr. Udovic's May 29, 2009, letter.) <br />COLE: Willi have an opportunity to make statements about this? <br />CHAIR: Yeah, hold on a second. All right, sir, Mr. Udovic, go on, if you have anything <br />else. <br />UDOVIC: I don't really I don't think we have anything to say. <br />CHAIR: I agree that this Board has enough documentation, back -up documentation, to <br />make a decision on this. <br />LUM: Whacky, by the way whacky, by the way, in a couple of my big dictionaries, says <br />eccentric and odd as the definition. It doesn't say it doesn't say crazy, it doesn't say, <br />you know it says odd, eccentric. I've forgotten there was a third one. But it was not <br />an extremely harsh it was not an extremely harsh word, if it was ever said. <br />COLE: Okay, do we have any questions for oh, I'm sorry. <br />LUM: Irrational was the other one. So we cannot answer when this supposedly was <br />said, originally. <br />UDOVIC: I don't think we should, even if it was said, because it's not our obligation <br />to <br />LUM: -- Somebody else said it. <br />UDOVIC: I don't know. What it is, is I ask you a question - -what do you think about Mr. <br />Dill? Does that mean that you have an opinion if you don't we just can't go that far. <br />CHAIR: Any other questions from the Board? <br />MARTIN: Mr. Chair? <br />CHAIR: Yes? <br />MARTIN. Mr. Dill. Does Ms. Naeole not remember every saying this? <br />UDOVIC: No, I think that our position is that it's incumbent upon the petitioner to <br />present evidence that these statements were made by Ms. Naeole. There is no evidence <br />that this statement was made by Ms. Naeole. The evidence is only stated, as he says <br />specifically, in the newspaper article, where Mr. Quirk says what do you think about her <br />opinion. That's not sufficient to even raise an ethical violation. <br />20 <br />