My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-03-10 Board of Ethics Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2006-2010
>
2010-03-10 Board of Ethics Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2011 2:11:13 PM
Creation date
6/30/2011 1:57:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. NEW BUSINESS <br />a. Financial disclosure training set for December 2010. <br />Ms. Schoen advised that as a result of financial disclosure filing deadlines, she received <br />multiple inquiries regarding the financial disclosure form and how to complete the document. <br />She has arranged for training classes in December, 2010 in both Hilo and Kona, to help County <br />employees fill out the form. She anticipates that the forms will be completed more fully after the <br />training. The Board members are invited to attend and notices will be sent out prior to the <br />training classes. <br />b. Communication No. 2010 -13 regarding "kuleana access" and various <br />allegations of wrongdoing by County officers and employees. <br />Ms. Schoen advised the Board that she provided copies of a letter addressed to the Board <br />which appears to be a petition. The matter was agendized in counsel's report to the Board <br />instead of as a new petition because there are several matters the Board need to consider upon <br />this initial review, including that the communication was not signed, there is no citation to a <br />specific code of Ethics provision, and many of the allegations appeared outside the jurisdiction <br />of the Board. The Board must determine whether or not more information should be requested <br />or whether the Board should send a letter rejecting the document for lack of jurisdiction. All of <br />the attachments were available for the Board's review. In a typical situation, a notice would be <br />sent to the person(s) involved in the complaint, but that hasn't been done yet pending the Board's <br />decision as to what action, if any, they would take. <br />After being provided background information and after further review of the <br />documentation, the Chair recommended that a letter be sent to the individual, encouraging that a <br />petition be filed if she feels that a violation of the Ethics Code has taken place, and identifying <br />which behavior is in violation of the Ethics Code, and to be directed to the appropriate code <br />language as none of the allegations cited are within the Board of Ethics' jurisdiction. <br />Motion and vote: Ms. Gentry so moved, Ms. Nicholson seconded, and all members <br />present voted aye. <br />6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />a. Review of the Board's proposed changes to the Ethics Code. <br />The Board reviewed a redlined version of the Board's proposed changes to the Ethics <br />Code which Ms. Schoen prepared and agreed that the revised version be submitted to Council. <br />The Board further discussed whether to submit its proposed changes independently or in <br />conjunction with the proposal submitted by Mayor William Kenoi, and which alternative would <br />be the best route to follow. <br />The Chair stated that they wanted to work in concert with the Mayor, since he sought <br />their advice. Although they didn't agree with all his proposals, they need to work together and <br />help him accomplish what is best for the community. He suggested they send a simple letter to <br />the Mayor, requesting that he keep them informed on when he submits his proposals to the <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.