Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Flores stated the Commission didn't drop properties from the list just because it was <br />already in motion; it was kept on. Mr. Flores stated in the assessment process, they might <br />get lowered in priority, but they wouldn't get dropped from the list. If there was a final <br />acquisition for purchase, then we can remove it from our list. <br />Mr. Yada stated during the Council meeting, Honoli`i came in through a different route <br />and confused the whole issue because the Council's resolution in their ranking of the <br />acquisitions also included Honoli`i, which wasn't even on the Commission's list. <br />Mr. Gilmartin stated that this Commission was only advisory; Council makes the <br />decisions and they can take anything they want into account. <br />Mr. Kaneshiro stated he thought that the Council was also looking for guidance on how <br />to do things; this Commission needs to provide guidance to the Council. <br />Mr. Gilmartin stated based on what this Commission submitted in December and how we <br />ranked those properties; the top group of 5 or 7 was essentially equal; they were all <br />closely ranked by one or two points on a subjective scale. Mr. Gilmartin stated he <br />would've put them all in one class and they could have picked any one of them. <br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />Discuss with the Commission the need to adopt a rule regarding a procedure for <br />taking properties off the priority list upon request by the property owner. <br />Mr. Kaneshiro stated that the Commission will defer discussion with the Commission on <br />the need to adopt a rule regarding procedure for take properties off the priority list upon <br />request by the property owner until the next meeting. <br />Mr. Gilmartin asked Mr. Kaneshiro if he was talking about the letters that Corporation <br />Counsel was going to draft to property owners. <br />Mr. Kaneshiro replied yes. <br />• Discussion of assessment and criteria and revision of forms. <br />Mr. Gilmartin questioned about asking the submitter who they would suggest on the long <br />term maintenance of the property. <br />Mr. Flores stated that it was on the Suggestion Form under Attachment C. Mr. Flores <br />stated if the public asked what the difference was between this form and the one <br />previously submitted, this form requested additional information so that the assessment of <br />the property could be done more efficiently and the Commission would have a better <br />understanding about the property. Mr. Flores stated the more information the person can <br />provide, the better the Commission can rank the property. Mr. Flores stated that the <br />