Laserfiche WebLink
• Assessment of 2007 Suggestion Forms <br />Mr. Kaneshiro asked the Commission if they were able to review the draft list which tabulates <br />the scoring of the commissioners for all properties submitted. <br />Mr. Campbell expressed his concerns over the large discrepancies between the scoring for <br />certain properties and suggested that some of the properties be re- scored. He felt that this was a <br />major concern. <br />Ms. Schuster stated that there will most likely be discrepancies because the scores were based <br />individually and she feels that it's okay. <br />Mr. Flores commented that it's not a major concern since the scoring was done among a majority <br />of the commissioners. <br />Ms. Springer added that previously since it was done in small groups there was less personal <br />accountability and this draft shows the individual scoring of each commissioners which is easier <br />to track. <br />Mr. Kaneshiro commented that some of the requests submitted may never have high scores and <br />suggested that maybe they need to be separated between acquisitions, buffer zones and public <br />access easements. <br />Mr. Yada noted how that situation is a good illustration of why purchasing for public access <br />through a private property versus acquisition may be harder to negotiate due to various issues. <br />Mr. Kaneshiro added that these are some of the issues that should be taken into consideration <br />when scoring next year's request. <br />Mr. Gilmartin stated that regardless of what the requests are for, the public needs to submit a <br />complete packet with more information to meet the scoring criteria of the Commission. <br />Mr. Flores commented that this is an initial screening process and the Commission should avoid <br />the ranking and look at the properties in detail which could change later despite the percentage. <br />Discussion of 2007 Annual Report to the Mayor <br />(The commissioners went into discussion of the 2007 Annual Report to the Mayor.) <br />• Discussion of 2007 prioritized list and procedures. <br />(The Commissioners went into discussion regarding the 2007 prioritized list and procedures.) <br />Motion: Commissioner Flores moved that the Commission consider looking at the properties <br />with a criteria score of 70 percent or higher on the comprehensive list submitted for 2007 for <br />this year's evaluation process for the prioritized list. Commissioner Springer seconded. All <br />members voted aye, motion carried. <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />