Laserfiche WebLink
(Mr. Abel Simeona Lui, Kohanaiki of Kawa `a, Moku O Keawe Ohana, addressed the <br />Commission on his concerns in regards to Kawa `a). He told the Commission that it's not their <br />job to make decisions concerning the lands in the Kingdom of Hawaii. These kuleana and royal <br />patent lands are family's and ancestor lands and the Commission has no say over lands that are <br />not theirs, and is therefore trespassing. He further added that these lands were never for sale, and <br />the Commission has no right to purchase. <br />(Professor Ah Lui introduced herself as ohana makua, body politic and head of the family on <br />behalf of lands in Kawa `a). She told the Commission that they are negotiating lands that have no <br />clear title and stated that it is a "malicious intent" to remove her brother, Mr. Abel Lui from <br />lands in Kawa`a. She then told the Commission that if they are to use public monies to purchase <br />titles that are clouded, they are doing something fraudulent for the greed of preserving properties. <br />Mr. Kaneshiro noted that the Commission is strictly an advisory to the Mayor and do not make <br />the final decisions. He suggested to Ms. Lui that she go and talk to the Hawaii County Council <br />who has the final say. <br />Mr. Lui further added that Land Commission Award Nos. 993 and 1530 are not for lands in <br />Kawa`a, it's for lands in Kahuku, Oahu. Mr. Kaneshiro thanked Mr. and Ms. Lui for their <br />comments. <br />Mr. Kaneshiro asked the Commission how this draft list will be prepared. Mr. Gilmartin <br />expressed that he feels that site visits of the property is an option that should be pursued for the <br />top properties. <br />Ms. Springer asked Mr. Bancroft how the Commission would go about setting up site visits on <br />some of these properties. Mr. Bancroft replied that they would follow the normal agendized <br />rules. He further added that it depends on how much commissioners will be present at the site <br />and noted that he will provide a written determination to the Commission and have it sent out <br />before the next meeting in November. <br />Mr. Kaneshiro mentioned that once they get clarification from Corporation Counsel, can they <br />proceed with site visits. Mr. Yada noted that they also need to obtain the landowner's approval <br />in order to access certain properties. <br />Ms. Springer then asked who would be contacting the individual landowners to get approval. <br />Ms. Schuster suggested that they contact Ms. Gail Byrne to come in and do a presentation for the <br />Kohala properties due to the amount of time left to complete the report. <br />Ms. Springer noted that the Commissioners should have the same information at the same time <br />when doing site visits. Mr. Bancroft suggested that if they do plan to visit a site they should go <br />together as a Commission. Ms. Garcia asked if it was possible for them to go as small groups. <br />Ms. Springer further noted that there are rules governing the work of committees and <br />Commissions and there may not be enough time. <br />Ms. Springer concluded that the Commission needs to be educated on site visits for this year and <br />upon the legal determination proceed with site visits for next year's report. <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />