My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-02-09 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Minutes
>
2005 - 2024
>
2009
>
2009-02-09 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 2:04:41 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 2:00:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Yada confirmed that all commissioners had received an OIP opinion provided by Ms. Self <br />regarding site inspections. The OIP opinion provides the procedure for site visits. <br />Ms. Springer indicated that Ms. Self continued to caution the Commissioners about site inspections, <br />in addition to their Sunshine obligation. The site inspections will probably not be on the actual site, <br />but be from a distance. <br />Ms. Garcia reaffirmed that one or two commissioners are able to visit a site. Once visited, they can <br />discuss this with a community group member, familiar with the site and report back to the <br />Commission. <br />Ms. Springer confirmed that what they want to accomplish at this meeting is to articulate, even an <br />informal process, the process for site inspections. This will allow the Commissioners to have a place <br />in the records to refer back to for guidance. <br />Ms. Garcia wishes to spell out their site inspection process, either in an informal inspection or a <br />formal inspection. <br />Ms. Springer asked, if they would like to defer to the next meeting the choice of doing an informal <br />(2 or less), an assigned sub - committee or as a group inspection. <br />Ms. Garcia asked the Commission, if they would like to decide as of today or if they would like to <br />defer to the next meeting. <br />Ms. Springer clarified that the Commissioners should come to the next meeting deciding what type <br />of site inspections they prefer and also come prepared with recommended language. <br />Mr. Komata asked for clarification as to the choices. <br />Mr. Yada indicated that the assigned sub - committee is under quorum, but more than three. <br />Ms. Moon wanted another clarification as to what is being asked for at the next meeting. <br />Ms. Springer indicated that the Commissioners are to come back to the next meeting with <br />guidelines for site inspections. <br />Commissioner Ms. Moon moved to defer discussion of site inspections to the next meeting, seconded <br />by Commissioner Ms. Markovich and carried unanimously by voice vote. <br />• Commission to strategize on outreach activities (multi -media approach — TV, radio, <br />newspaper, etc.) on how to solicit new suggestion forms <br />Ms. Garcia suggested that a full page Newspaper Ad be done. This was how Ms. Garcia <br />became informed regarding the Commission. <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.