My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-07-14 Letter to Constance Kiriu re Hawaii's Resign to Run Law and Charter Provisions Pertaining to Vacancies in County Elected Offices
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Legal Opinions
>
2006-07-14 Letter to Constance Kiriu re Hawaii's Resign to Run Law and Charter Provisions Pertaining to Vacancies in County Elected Offices
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2011 4:16:56 PM
Creation date
7/15/2011 4:15:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Honorable Constance Kiriu <br /> July 14, 2006 <br /> Page 7 <br /> charter pertaining to council voting, it means the entire membership of nine <br /> members, even if there (sic)vacancies. <br /> In the United States, there is a general split of authority with respect to the <br /> legal ability of remaining council members to fill vacancies, when there is less <br /> than a quorum of members left in office. For illustration purposes, we discuss <br /> one case that allowed less than a full majority of members to which the council <br /> was entitled to proceed to fill a vacant position. <br /> In Schisler v. Clausing, Not Reported in N.E.2d, 1980 WL 351087 (Ohio <br /> App. 4 Dist. 1980),2 at issue was the following provision from the Portsmouth <br /> (Ohio) City Charter: <br /> If a vacancy occurs in the Council, except as the result of a recall election, some <br /> eligible person shall be chosen within thirty (30) days by a majority vote of the <br /> remaining members of Council to fill the unexpired term. <br /> At the time, the Portsmouth City Council was comprised of a full <br /> membership of six members. There were only five active members, as the sixth <br /> member had recently resigned. At issue were three meetings where only three <br /> of the remaining five members appeared. At these meetings, over the objection <br /> and protestation of the Council's attorney,3 the three present members by <br /> unanimous vote proceeded to select Marceline Shepherd to the single Council <br /> vacancy. <br /> The Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, held that the appointment <br /> was proper, and "a majority vote of the remaining members" meant that only <br /> three votes were necessary, as three members represented a majority of the <br /> remaining members (five). <br /> It is important to note here Schisler may be distinguished from the <br /> circumstances presented in our present hypothetical, since Hawaii County's <br /> Charter provision specifically requires (and is unambiguously clear) that a <br /> majority of the entire membership (nine members) is necessary for official action, <br /> even if there are vacancies. Thus, five votes remain necessary for our Hawaii <br /> County Council to take any official action. <br /> Our Hawaii State Constitution, Hawaii Revised Statutes, Hawaii <br /> Administrative Rules, and County Charter provide little guidance on the specific <br /> 2 We recognize unpublished opinions should not be cited to a court for the purpose of arguing <br /> precedent. In the present matter,we cite this case to the County Clerk for the purpose of legal <br /> analysis only. <br /> 3 Not wise to ignore your attorney(most of the time). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.