My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-03-11 Letter to Constance Kiriu from Lincoln Ashida re Appointing Authority of the County Clerk
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Legal Opinions
>
2005-03-11 Letter to Constance Kiriu from Lincoln Ashida re Appointing Authority of the County Clerk
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2011 4:18:25 PM
Creation date
7/15/2011 4:18:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Honorable Constance Kiriu <br /> March 11, 2005 <br /> Page 5 <br /> natural and most obvious sense, without resorting to an artificial or forced <br /> construction, and each word must be given its appropriate meaning and <br /> sense must be brought out of the words used. <br /> 574 N.Y.S.2d at 642-643 (Citations omitted throughout; emphasis supplied). <br /> Critics of our position will no doubt argue that since Charter Section 3-6 <br /> provides that Council approval for the appointment of the Deputy County Clerk <br /> and Legislative Auditor is required, the same Council approval is necessary for <br /> their removal. This argument is not supported by our laws. In fact, this argument <br /> is exactly the type of"artificial or forced construction" discussed by the Rine <br /> court, supra. Nowhere in our Charter Section 3-6 does it require Council <br /> approval for the removal of these two officers. <br /> Although the Council is the appointing authority of the County Clerk, they <br /> are not the appointing authority of the Deputy County Clerk and Legislative <br /> Auditor. This authority is clearly and unambiguously vested with the County <br /> Clerk. When the term or tenure of a public officer is not fixed by law, and the <br /> removal is not governed by a constitutional or statutory provision, as a rule, the <br /> power of removal is incident to the power to appoint. 63 Am.Jr.2d Section 171; <br /> accord Richman v. Staley, 48 F.3d 1139 (1995) (Generally, power of removal is <br /> implicit in the power of appointment unless the appointment carries with it a <br /> definite term of office or constitutional or statutory provision limits the removal <br /> power). <br /> There exists a "check and balance" in our present law which provides a <br /> remedy for the Council, in the event they are not satisfied with the decision made <br /> by the County Clerk in the removal of either the Deputy County Clerk or <br /> Legislative Auditor (or for any other reason justifying the termination of an at-will <br /> employee). Since the appointing authority of the County Clerk is the Council, the <br /> County Clerk may be removed by action of the Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.