My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-04-07_Bill 270_Ordinance_re_Office_of_Police_Oversight
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Legal Opinions
>
2008-04-07_Bill 270_Ordinance_re_Office_of_Police_Oversight
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2011 4:35:22 PM
Creation date
7/15/2011 4:33:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Honorable Brenda Ford <br /> April 7, 2008 <br /> Page 9 <br /> public,6 the citizen complainant is advised whether the police officer was <br /> sanctioned or not. <br /> 3. Questions raised by Councilwoman Brenda Ford. <br /> Councilwoman Brenda Ford raised questions regarding this bill. With <br /> respect to "who" is accountable to the public for the conduct of the police, Chief <br /> Mahuna on March 24`h succinctly answered in no uncertain terms it is the Police <br /> Chief. Under the present system of our laws, the mayor nominates police <br /> commissioners from each of the Council districts, who must be confirmed by the <br /> Council. These commissioners alone are responsible for the hiring and firing of <br /> the Chief. This system ensures neither the administration or council will have <br /> unfettered and unilateral authority or influence in the hiring and firing of the chief. <br /> This system best illustrates the wisdom of checks and balances found in our <br /> Hawai'i County Charter (2000). <br /> Councilwoman Ford also sought additional information concerning <br /> national accreditation and video cameras in patrol vehicles. These administrative <br /> and operational matters should be covered by the police department <br /> representatives at the April 8, 2008 meeting where continued discussion on Bill <br /> 270 will occur. <br /> 4. Will the Council lose its legislative immunity if it passes Bill 270 <br /> and essentially manages the Office of Police Oversight and <br /> Complaints? <br /> Article III, Section 7 of the Hawai'i State Constitution provides for the <br /> legislative immunity of State legislators "for any statement made or action taken <br /> in the exercise of the member's legislative functions." There is no corollary <br /> provision in our Charter for Council members. However, it is long recognized in <br /> municipal government that council members performing legislative functions are <br /> immune from legal action. In Hawaii, the determination of what constitutes a <br /> "legislative function" is left to a case-by-case analysis and determination. <br /> Abercrombie v. McClung, 55 Haw. 595, 525 P.2d 594 (1974). <br /> We need look no further than Article III, Section 3-1 of the Hawaii County <br /> Charter (2000) for a proper definition of legislative function in our county. That <br /> section provides as follows (emphasis supplied): <br /> Powers and functions. The legislative powers of the county shall be vested in <br /> the county council. Its primary function shall be legislation and public policy <br /> formulation, as distinct and separate from the executive administration of <br /> county government. <br /> 6 Chapter 92F, Hawaii Revised Statutes, as amended. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.