Laserfiche WebLink
RECOMMENDATIONS - GENERAL FINDINGS <br />• A mechanism for regular and frequent review and reporting of stakeholder progress <br />by a body reporting to the legislative branch. <br />DEM Response <br />As described above, the ISWMP consultant original scope of work does not require that the Update <br />include a mechanism for regular and frequent review as it is not a requirement of HRS §342G. <br />LAO Follow -Up <br />Again, whether part of or external to the ISWMP, it is important that an overall "working plan" <br />delineate specific tasks, responsible parties, and timelines to guide implementation of the ISWMP. <br />The Council should also require regular reporting of actuals against the plan in order to ensure <br />effective resource planning and allocation, timely progress, and public accountability. <br />• Standardized criteria for evaluation of solid waste management programs, <br />technologies, and funding sources. <br />DEM Response <br />The ISWMP will present evaluation of a series of options. <br />LAO Follow -Up <br />The evaluation process should be standardized and documented to permit future in -house analysis of <br />solid waste programs, technologies, and funding sources. <br />• An evaluation of regulatory constraints to implementation of identified solid waste <br />management programs and technologies. <br />DEM Response <br />The ISWMP will provide a list of recommended regulations which may be considered for <br />implementation at the County or State level to move forward the goals and objectives of the solid <br />waste management programs and technologies. <br />• A timeline and prioritization schedule for implementation of identified solid waste <br />management programs and technologies. <br />DEM Response <br />The ISWMP will include a 5 -year implementation plan for the plan recommendations that includes <br />funding levels for each recommendation. Any actions to be completed later than 5 years will be <br />summarized into actions to be taken during years 6 -20. <br />• A standardized process for determining whether implementation and operation of <br />identified programs and technologies should be managed by County personnel or <br />outsourced to a private contractor. <br />DEM Response <br />This is outside the scope of the ISWMP. The KONO court decision describes when County of <br />Hawaii personnel will do the work. In addition Act 90 has expired. <br />3 <br />