My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-01-AU Follow-up Review of the 2006 Audit of the Department of Environmental Management's Recycling and Diversion Grants Program
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
County Auditor Reports
>
2009-01-AU Follow-up Review of the 2006 Audit of the Department of Environmental Management's Recycling and Diversion Grants Program
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2011 2:33:45 PM
Creation date
7/19/2011 12:22:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECOMMENDATIONS - GENERAL FINDINGS <br />LAO Follow -Up <br />This recommendation is not directed at the work - related legal requirements of the Kono decision. <br />Rather, it is recommending an analysis of providing "in- house" solid waste management services with <br />County personnel due to the long -term need for such services and the time and costs required to <br />implement sufficient controls over privately contracted services. <br />• A standardized policy and procedure setting forth departmental controls to be <br />implemented and identifying which departmental personnel will be responsible for <br />program oversight. <br />DEM Response <br />The ISWMP will describe the current department structure as it pertains to the management of the <br />solid waste division and recycling section. The department maintains a set of operational policies and <br />procedures specific to the solid waste division and recycling section, these policies and procedures <br />are not planned to be included in the Update. <br />LAO Follow -Up <br />Based on discussions with DEM managers, there still seems to be uncertainty as to who is <br />responsible for ensuring that internal controls are included and implemented in each solid waste <br />diversion and recycling program. <br />• A standardized process for reviewing and evaluating the County's, DEM's, and the <br />contractor's responsibilities and obligations under specific contracts, including <br />monitoring of regulatory compliance and data reporting accuracy. <br />DEM Response <br />This is beyond the scope of the ISWMP as it is not a requirement of HRS §342G. <br />LAO Follow -Up <br />Agreed. However, the County as a whole should review key responsibilities in its procurement and <br />contracting processes and formalize policies and procedures related to the sufficiency and <br />enforcement of project specifications, internal controls, contractor performance measures, and <br />remedies for contractor non - compliance and non - performance. <br />• Standardized policies, procedures, and safeguards necessary to reduce the County's <br />risk to contractor abuse and /or fraud to acceptable levels. <br />DEM Response <br />As described above, the ISWMP consultant original scope of work did not require that the Update <br />include a provision for including standardized policies, procedures and safeguards as it is not a <br />requirement of HRS §342G. <br />LAO Follow -Up <br />If so, DEM should develop, communicate, and implement standardized policies, procedures, and <br />safeguards in consultation with the Finance Department and Corporation Counsel. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.