My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-01-AU Follow-up Review of the 2006 Audit of the Department of Environmental Management's Recycling and Diversion Grants Program
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
County Auditor Reports
>
2009-01-AU Follow-up Review of the 2006 Audit of the Department of Environmental Management's Recycling and Diversion Grants Program
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2011 2:33:45 PM
Creation date
7/19/2011 12:22:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECOMMENDATIONS - GENERAL FINDINGS <br />• Consult with other County departments and State agencies to establish "best <br />practices" in order to minimize its risk and exposure to governmental sanctions and <br />civil liabilities. <br />DEM Response <br />This recommendation should be pursued by Finance Department as it will affect all County <br />Departments, not just DEM. <br />LAO Follow -Up <br />While overall risk management includes components outside of the department's purview, DEM <br />should devise a mechanism to incorporate "best practices" as they relate to the solid waste <br />management industry. <br />• Immediately transmit any and all communications received from governmental <br />agencies regarding possible regulatory violations or sanctions to the Mayor, <br />Managing Director, Finance Director, Corporation Counsel, and County Council. <br />DEM Response <br />Please refer to the letter from former Director Barbara Bell, dated July 10, 2006 on page 7- Risk <br />Management. <br />LAO Follow -Up <br />It appears that DEM has implemented a procedure for timely communication and tracking of <br />responses to governmental regulatory notices when DEM is the permittee or co- permittee. <br />• Develop formal written policies and procedures for general departmental <br />administration as well as individual program management, including, but not limited <br />to: <br />o A file management system for departmental and contractor documents, <br />reports, plans, and other related information to ensure that program files are <br />current and complete. <br />DEM Response <br />DEM developed a formal contract policy effective 811106 (Refer to Attachment "A" Contract Policy) in <br />response the audit recommendation: The purpose was to provide better tracking of contract history, <br />negotiations, or discussion, on issues that are unexpected, and to document discretionary decisions <br />instituting written policies and procedures for all contract files. It states that two (2) contract tiles are <br />to be maintained; one is a "program file" maintained by the section responsible for managing the <br />program and the second is a "contract tile" to be maintained by the Business Services Section. The <br />Solid Waste operations and its sections are located in a separate location than the DEM <br />Administration and Business Services Section and the files are physically located with the respective <br />group. The program tiles for Greenwaste, Diversion Programs, Recycling Education and Beverage <br />Container Program are maintained by the Department's Recycling Section. The program files for <br />Scrap Metal and Tires are maintained by the Department's Abandoned Vehicle Program Staff. The <br />Department of Health (DOH) Solid Waste Permits and any correspondence with DOH (where the <br />County is co- permittee) are tiled in the program file and a copy in the files for each Solid Waste <br />Facility maintained in the Solid Waste Division Chiefs Office. Many of the Transfer Stations have <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.