My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-02-AU Limited Scope Performance Audit of the Highway Fund
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
County Auditor Reports
>
2009-02-AU Limited Scope Performance Audit of the Highway Fund
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2011 2:48:36 PM
Creation date
7/19/2011 2:40:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 4: CHALLENGES FACING THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />and may promote a continued misunderstanding that the disputed <br />roads issue still exists." However, the audit found that: "[T]he <br />conditions, maintenance activity and evaluation of these disputed <br />roadways were similar to those owned outright by the city, as <br />documented in the 2005 island -wide inventory." The Oahu scenario <br />further exemplifies the need for Hawai'i County to establish a <br />complete and accurate inventory of all County roads; address and <br />resolve legal issues involving roads -in- limbo; and develop clear <br />policies and criteria for County acceptance of road ownership and <br />maintenance responsibilities including roads -in- limbo. <br />A District Overseer reported that road paving and resurfacing work <br />has been performed by County personnel with County equipment <br />on certain subdivision roads that are privately owned. If so, this <br />raises the question of whether such work constitutes proper <br />expenditure of the Highway Fund. The County needs to address <br />whether costs of manpower and equipment utilized on privately <br />owned roads need to be reimbursed to the Highway Fund. Again, <br />the lack of a clear and consistently applied written policy and <br />procedure as well as standard criteria for determining which <br />subdivision roads receive County road maintenance may result in <br />public perception of impropriety and favoritism, or possible litigation <br />arising out of the lack of consistently applied criteria and claims of <br />misuse of Highway Fund revenues. <br />The Hawai'i State Legislative Reference Bureau stated in its 1989 <br />report entitled Roads -in- Limbo: An Analysis of State - County <br />Jurisdictional Dispute that: "Today, the dispute continues, as it will <br />likely continue twenty years from now if no serious consideration is <br />given to the problem and a concerted but cooperative effort is made <br />on the part of all involved to deal with the real issues. Only if the <br />principals involved adopt an attitude of mutually striving to arrive at <br />a consensus of what has to be done rather than one of saying the <br />responsibility lies elsewhere, will the parties have made the first <br />genuine attempts at resolving a situation whose correction is long <br />overdue." <br />The County should consider the impact of this lingering state of <br />limbo on its ability to attain the Highway Fund's mission statement: <br />"To maintain and continually make improvements to the County's <br />roadway transportation system to permit the safe and efficient <br />movement of people and goods around the island." This inaction <br />on the part of prior County Administrations points to the lack of <br />strategic and operational planning and vision to translate the <br />Highway Fund mission statement into relevant and measurable <br />objectives and action plans to address and resolve the roads -in- <br />limbo issue. While roads -in -limbo remains an issue State -wide, the <br />newly elected Mayor's mantra of "Together We Can" is what is <br />needed to resolve what the Hawai'i State Legislative Reference <br />Bureau has called "a situation whose correction is long overdue." <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.