My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-05-19 Leeward Exh A - 327 Kona
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2011
>
2011-05-19 Leeward Exh A - 327 Kona
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2011 10:39:47 AM
Creation date
7/21/2011 3:21:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
dialogue from the Commission, if they have anything to say that may be supportive or counter to <br />what I’ve just explained. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Any comments, Commissioners? Commissioner Nelson. <br /> <br />NELSON: We do have a motion and a second on the floor. We need to address that. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Thank you. This is discussion on the motion. <br /> <br />NELSON: Okay. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Thank you. Any other -? Commissioner Hickcox. <br /> <br />HICKCOX: Madam Chair, if I may? <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Certainly. <br /> <br />HICKCOX: I concur with our Director’s recommendations in reference to an unfavorable response, <br />and that’s basically based on language within the CDP. I am not really clear as to whether or not <br />this body can make a ruling in reference to the validity of the CDP’s requirements. My <br />recommendations would be that consideration be given to addressing the specific issues that were <br />raised by Sid, and they are quite valid, however, because of a wide reaching effect of the decisions <br />that we make at this particular juncture, it would become necessary in my opinion to have either the <br />corp. counsel review it in its entirety to see where we stand with this, or as another thing, or another <br />avenue is to have the applicant challenge a negative ruling in court in reference to the CDP. That’s <br />where my head is kind of going through right now. I really, you know, we can defer the decision <br />until maybe corp. counsel make some recommendations, but right now just based on the evidence <br />presented to us, I cannot vote in favor of that because it violates the CDP. So, I mean it’s <br />unfortunate, but I think to have a long-lasting effect on this thing, it’s got to go out of our hands; it’s <br />got to go towards to corp. counsel, to the courts, if necessary, to wherever it may take to correct this <br />wrong. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Thank you, Commissioner Hickcox. Any other comments, Commissioners? <br />Questions? Concerns? <br /> <br />FUKE: Madam Chair? <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Yes, Mr. Fuke. <br /> <br />FUKE: I know that you are in deliberation. Would I be able to just make one comment, just to <br />clarify the applicant’s position? <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Is that all right, Commissioners? Sure, thank you. <br /> <br />FUKE: Which is kind of like what I had on my last – shucks, is it this one – so looking at the <br />bottom, just to let you know, if the Commission is inclined to recommend denial of the application <br />to the Council, we also ask that you include a statement or two asking the Council to revisit the <br />Kona Community Development Plan, and among the other consequences noted earlier, to seek ways <br />10 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.