My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-05-19 Leeward Exh A - 327 Kona
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2011
>
2011-05-19 Leeward Exh A - 327 Kona
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2011 10:39:47 AM
Creation date
7/21/2011 3:21:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ARAI: Obviously, you are aware of the Director’s unfavorable recommendation; if you are going <br />to go ahead with a favorable recommendation, then that motion must be accompanied by findings to <br />support your favorable recommendation. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Correct. <br /> <br />ARAI: And maybe even draft conditions of approval or -. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Could you help us or Commissioner Beaudet? <br /> <br />LEITHEAD TODD: Perhaps we could take a break. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Okay. May we call for a recess? <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Call for a recess for clarification. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Please, a recess for clarification? <br /> <br />ARAI: Sure, a recess will be appropriate. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Ten, five, ten minutes? <br /> <br />ARAI: Can we make it -. Five minutes is fine. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Five minutes, okay, a five-minute recess, and we’ll call you back. Thank you. <br /> <br />RECESSED The Chair called a recess at 10:10 a.m. <br /> <br />RECONVENED The meeting reconvened at 10:22 a.m. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Commissioner Beaudet? <br /> <br />BEAUDET: For the record, I think – (microphone problem) how’s that, is it working, okay – I <br />think I need a minute or two to just elaborate on what my concerns are with the situation that we <br />have here. The application for the change of zone is in compliance with the zoning plans within the <br />General Plan, it does comply with the zoning requirements for the CDP, you know, for the most <br />part, access to or availability of utilities is all in place or accessible in that given area, and there is <br />surrounding development; but the one thing that it doesn’t meet is the infrastructure requirement of <br />the roads. My issue with what we have in front of us is that here we have an application for <br />rezoning, but it’s under, given the way that the CDP is written, the approval of that rezoning is <br />restricted until certain roads are built, which all falls under the responsibility of the County. <br />Currently and for the near future which we can see, there is no need to justify the County to seek the <br />funding to develop that road. So my position here is to, because the CDP doesn’t speak to any <br />means of collaboration, that is the position that I’m trying to find – find the way that private <br />landowners can work with the government in order to expedite certain projects that will be <br />beneficial to our community and that fall within the compliance of the plans that we have in front of <br />us whether they be General Plan or the CDP. So, with that, you know, I’d like to encourage any <br />9 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.