My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-07-12 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2011
>
2011-07-12 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2011 9:07:30 AM
Creation date
7/27/2011 9:07:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br /> <br />1.Design Review of a proposed outdoor dining and served seating area addition to an existing <br />enclosed restaurant fronting Kamakahonu Bay at King Kamehameha’s Kona Beach Hotel. <br />Applicant: King Kamehameha’s Kona Beach Hotel. TMKs: 7-5-006: 020 and 032. Address: <br />75-5660 Palani Road. Hotel is located at the junction of Palani Road, Ka‘ahumanu Place and <br />Ali‘i Drive, above Kailua Pier. Proposed addition to be located mauka (inland) of existing paved <br />beachwalk above Kamakahonu beach. <br /> <br />Mr. Childs oriented the Commissioners regarding the subject and surrounding properties on the <br />location map, and described the proposed project. He pointed out that the proposed project was <br />on a parcel of land that was on the State and National Registers of Historic Sites, and that while <br />the project contained desirable attributes such as creation of open activity areas attractive to and <br />supportive of pedestrian use, the provision of umbrellas or similar shade covers could easily be <br />imagined, which could have visual impacts on the historic character of the area. <br /> <br />The applicant’s representatives, Jak Hu and Daniel Hyde, were present. Mr. Hyde presented <br />further information, which included that there would be no additional lighting for the subject <br />area, that no umbrellas would be necessary since the proposed dining area was intended for <br />breakfast and dinner business, and that the proposed low rock wall, which would demarcate the <br />dining area from the lawn area, would be similar to existing lava rock walls throughout the hotel <br />property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dunlap observed that the proposed rock wall was too high for its purpose, and <br />suggested that it be reduced in height, possibly designed with an undulating wall height above <br />grade. The representatives agreed to this modification. In response to the Chair’s question, Mr. <br />Hyde said that if the rock wall base were to require more room than what the plan indicated, they <br />would reduce the seating area rather than expanding the total area. Mr. Hu added that the <br />number of seating was not critical to the hotel since the purpose of this project was to create the <br />outdoor ambience, and that an 18-inch wall height would be acceptable. Commissioner Herbert <br />also suggested that the gate from the surrounding lawn area be placed perpendicularly between <br />two overlapped walls, rather than flush with the walls as shown on the plan. The representatives <br />agreed to this modification as well. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Dunlap’s inquiry, the staff reiterated that their concern would be <br />the visual impacts of potential umbrellas on the historical site. Mr. Hu said that if they were to <br />put up umbrellas, they would choose the same type as what already existed at the poolside for <br />uniformity. Commissioner Au Hoy pointed out that some local community organizations might <br />still see this development as desecration due to its proximity to the Ahu‘ena heiau, and advised <br />the applicant to be sensitive to local people’s feelings. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stanbro asked about the State and National Registers of Historic Sites designation <br />of the area, which the hotel property appeared to be encroaching on, as to what value the <br />designation had. Mr. Childs gave some background information on the designation, and said that <br />the regulation of a registered historic site was not within the jurisdiction of the County. <br />Mr. Mark added that the duty of the Commission in this case was to make a recommendation to <br />the Planning Director regarding the architectural design of the proposed project with respect to <br />the Master Plan for Kailua-Kona. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.