2011-07-12 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes

Home

The Commission also had a brief discussion about adding some landscaping, which might soften the appearance of the rock wall and restaurant activities, and also reduce a potential noise problem. The representatives noted that there was already a lot of foliage in the area and they would rather not hide the new rock wall. They also addressed the noise concern by noting that they already had lū‘au four evenings a week and live music at the poolside, and that they did not anticipate this outdoor dining area to add much to the existing noise level. Commissioner Herbert made a motion to approve the project and Commissioner Dunlap seconded the motion. Commissioner Au Hoy reiterated her concern about possible adverse impacts on the historically significant area, and strongly recommended consultation with the state Department of Land and Natural Resources. Commissioner Dunlap then withdrew his second and suggested revising the motion to include a condition that the project should not conflict with the wishes of local historical and/or cultural communities. After further discussion, Mr. Hu made a statement about the hotel’s continuous contribution toward the heiau and the community. With no second for the revised motion, the motion could not be considered. Commissioner Hetherington made a new motion that the Commission recommend to the Planning Director approval of the proposed project with the following request and condition:  The Commission requests that the proposed rock wall height surrounding the proposed dining area be lowered in part or in its entirety, and that appropriate landscaping along the rock wall be considered.  The recommendation for approval is made with the condition that, prior to any permitting decision being made, the Planning Director consult with appropriate local historical experts such as caretakers of the Ahu‘ena heiau about the project’s potential impacts on the historical site. Commissioner Au Hoy seconded the motion and emphasized the need for sensitivity to the historical importance of the area. A roll call vote was taken and the motion carried with five ayes (Hetherington, Au Hoy, Burns, Dunlap and Herbert), one no (Stanbro) and two absent and excused (Power and Saito). 2.Discussion of the Department of Public Works (DPW) program for revisions to Chapter 3, Hawai‘i County Code (the Sign Code), including the DPW report made to the Kailua Village Design Commission on May 24, 2011 and revision program information provided to the Planning Department for use by the Commission. Discussion to also include alternative or additional recommendations for revisions to the Sign Code as it relates to Kailua Village. It was moved by Commissioner Burns and seconded by Commissioner Hetherington that this item be deferred to the next meeting. Motion was unanimously carried by a voice vote of all Commissioners in attendance. 3.Formation of a Sign Committee of the Kailua Village Design Commission. It was moved by Commissioner Burns and seconded by Commissioner Hetherington that this item be also deferred to the next meeting. Motion was unanimously carried by a voice vote of all Commissioners in attendance. 4