My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-2014 Consolidated Plan
PublicDocuments
>
Office of Housing and Community Development
>
Plans & Studies
>
2010-2014 Consolidated Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2011 3:46:07 PM
Creation date
7/27/2011 2:39:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
■ Large related households, both renters and homeowners, show the highest rates of housing <br />problems. Among large related households with incomes below 30% of median, 94% of <br />renters and 90% of homeowners experienced problems. Among all large related households <br />in the State, 71 % of renters and 59% of owners experienced problems. (Table A -2) <br />• Housing affordability is a problem. Nearly one -third (32 %) of Hawai 'i 's households were <br />cost - burdened, with housing costs that exceed 30% of their income. 30% ofall owners and <br />35% of all renters were cost - burdened. <br />Data from CHAS 2000 was analyzed to determine if racial or ethnic groups experienced a <br />disproportionately greater need for any income category in comparison to the needs of that <br />category as a whole. HUD considers disproportionately greater need to exist when the <br />percentage of persons in a category of need who are members of a particular racial or ethnic <br />group is at least ten percentage points higher than the percentage of persons in the category as a <br />whole. Table A -3, in Appendix "A ", demonstrates that there is no disproportionate need <br />between Hispanic; White, Nora- Hispanic; Black, Non Hispanic; and "Other " households in the <br />State of Hawaii. <br />The extent of crowding (defined as 1.01 or more persons per room) decreased from 22 percent in <br />1992 to 8 percent in 2006 (see Table IV-2). This downward trend is anticipated to continue as <br />household sizes decrease, but may change with any prolonged economic downturn. The <br />statewide percentage of households that were overcrowded or doubled up (defined as multiple <br />families in one household) also decreased from 30 percent in 1992 to 15 percent in 2006 <br />Table IV -2: Household Composition and Crowding by County, <br />1992,1997, 2003 2006 <br />County <br />Year <br />Tata1 <br />Households <br />Crowding Inldicato <br />Percerna <br />overcrowded <br />pmoRr or snore per <br />i'oawa <br />Pereent of households that <br />are overcrowded or <br />doubled MK <br />Honolulu <br />1992 <br />247,349 <br />23% <br />32 % <br />1997 <br />272,234 <br />11% <br />27% <br />2003 <br />292,003 <br />10% <br />23% <br />2006 <br />303,149 <br />8% <br />15% <br />Maui <br />1992 <br />34,266 <br />27% <br />26% <br />1887 <br />39,251 <br />10% <br />25916 <br />2003 <br />43,687 <br />110/0 <br />18% <br />2006 <br />49,484 <br />8% <br />15a /o <br />Hawari <br />1992 <br />59,789 <br />19% <br />26% <br />1997 <br />46,271 <br />8% <br />24% <br />2003 <br />54,644 <br />7i6 <br />18% <br />2006 <br />61,213 <br />7% <br />16% <br />Kauai <br />19920 <br />16,981 <br />1 Ma <br />26% <br />1997 <br />18,817 <br />9% <br />25% <br />2003 <br />20,260 <br />6% <br />21% <br />2006 i <br />21,971 <br />7.0 <br />16% <br />Total <br />1992 <br />338,385 <br />22% <br />30% <br />1997 <br />376,574 <br />10% <br />27% <br />2003 <br />410,794 <br />10% <br />22% <br />2006 <br />435,818 <br />8% <br />15% <br />2010 -14 CP Find 24 <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.