My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011 State of Hawaii Homeless Persons Point-In-Time County Report
PublicDocuments
>
Office of Housing and Community Development
>
Plans & Studies
>
2011 State of Hawaii Homeless Persons Point-In-Time County Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2011 3:46:41 PM
Creation date
7/27/2011 2:56:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
State of Hawaii and /or the Department of Housing and Urban Development are required to participate in the <br />HMIS. Additionally, some privately funded agencies voluntarily utilize the HMIS. The Violence Against Women Act <br />of 2005 categorically excludes domestic violence providers from having to participate in the HMIS, however most <br />of the domestic violence shelters did participate in the count. <br />Before the 2009 count, HPHA received HUD's permission to deviate from the conventional PIT methodology of a <br />one -night physical count and to instead conduct a multiple -day physical count for the unsheltered homeless. The <br />dates of the sheltered and unsheltered counts adhered to HUD's strict policy that the counts must occur during the <br />last ten days of January. The deviation was permitted based on Hawaii's ability to unduplicate the unsheltered <br />homeless by using the HMIS. This HMIS methodology was used again for the 2011 count; however, several key <br />adjustments were made to ensure that data was as clean as possible and that users were able to quickly enter <br />surveyed unsheltered data. <br />The unsheltered homeless count was a multifaceted process that made use of survey instruments based on criteria <br />contained within HUD's Guide to Counting Unsheltered Homeless. These survey instruments were used by field <br />staff to document unsheltered responses. The surveys for persons determined to be unsheltered on the night of <br />January 25, 2011 were entered into the PIT module of the HMIS. With the assistance of Hybrid International, LLC, <br />the unsheltered single and household surveys were configured to mirror the hardcopy forms. This configuration <br />made it extremely easy for service providers to enter the unsheltered data they had obtained during the six day <br />survey period directly into the HMIS. Users could even populate pieces of the PIT survey forms with data from <br />existing users if they had previously been entered into the HMIS database. <br />After all unsheltered data had been entered into the HMIS; the aggregate data was exported into Excel. All data <br />entered into the online surveys became readily available in a tractable format. This data could then be <br />manipulated to produce the reports that HUD and the CoCs desired. Records containing little or no information, <br />sheltered homeless, duplicate counts, and refusals were removed from the aggregate data in an effort to obtain an <br />accurate unsheltered count. <br />The sheltered homeless count was primarily derived from HMIS client and intake data in the sheltered programs <br />section for the night of January 25, 2011. Shelters were contacted prior to this date and instructed that all clients <br />sleeping in their facility on the night of January 25, 2011, needed to be entered into the HMIS. Furthermore, <br />agencies were advised to make sure that all client and intake data were current. Follow -up with individual service <br />providers was also conducted to verify that the HMIS listing matched the nightly census. Shelters not participating <br />in the HMIS (such as domestic violence shelters) were contacted individually to provide the number of homeless <br />individuals and families residing at their shelters on the night of January 25, 2011, in addition to providing specific <br />subpopulation data. <br />Multiple meetings were conducted Statewide prior to the 2011 PIT. Agencies and persons included: the City's <br />Department of Community Services, the DHS's Homeless Programs Office, PIT Coordinators, interested Partners in <br />Care members, and rural county continuum members. The purpose of these meetings was to develop and refine <br />the count's methodology, and to revise survey instrumentation used for the unsheltered counts. The survey <br />instruments are attached as Appendices 1 and 2. <br />Point -in -Time Teams <br />PIT teams were composed of outreach workers from service agencies that regularly perform outreach to <br />unsheltered individuals and families experiencing homelessness. Agencies were assigned to areas on the islands <br />where they routinely provide outreach services. The reasoning for these assignments flowed naturally from the <br />fact that field staff would be most familiar with sites and persons to whom they routinely outreached and would <br />Z HUD's definition of an unsheltered homeless person is someone residing in a place not meant for human habitation, such as cars, parks, <br />sidewalks, abandoned buildings, or on the street. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.