|
MR. BALSIS: The statement of fact is the Hawai‘i County Board of Ethics Chairman
<br />John Dill conspired with Corporation Counsel Lincoln S. T. Ashida to derive [sic] a
<br />person of their state and federal constitutional rights.
<br />
<br />MR. COLE: And the petition you just voted on, that was the petition against Lincoln S. T.
<br />Ashida, correct?
<br />
<br />MR. BALSIS: That is correct.
<br />
<br />MR. COLE: Okay. This petition is an identical conspiracy with identical facts. Again,
<br />Chairman Dill, having sworn an oath to defend and protect the constitutions, did use his
<br />official position in order for the furtherance of criminal activities involved in violation of
<br />the United States Code, Title 18, Section 1040, fraud in connection with benefits and
<br />emergency—major emergency disaster and Section 341, conspiracy to defraud the
<br />United States government. In 2000, the reason that the extortion was done and these
<br />petitions were filed against Lincoln Ashida and John Dill, is they were conspiring to
<br />prevent me from coming forth with knowledge, actual knowledge cognizable by a court of
<br />law, of a violation of the United States Code involved in defrauding the United States
<br />government of emergency benefits from the federally declared disaster of 2000, where the
<br />County of Hawai‘i did in fact authorize by their own documentation obtained through the
<br />Freedom of Information Act that they altered the Waiakea Stream, a federal waterway
<br />identified, which can only be altered by an act of congress, did not dispose of material as
<br />per contract, Job No. P-3535, as signed by Harry Kim. The alteration by their own
<br />admission of the streams was to provide flood protection resulting in the $80+ million of
<br />damage in 2008 from the flooding event. The alteration of the stream and the billing of
<br />the federal government for goods and services that are not required under the Simpson
<br />Act, in violation of Title 18, United States Code 1040, constitutes a conspiracy against
<br />the United States Code—the United States—to defraud it. The appearance in order to
<br />prevent me from coming forth, as will be noted in the original petitions, was to make
<br />known to a body of an authority under the United States, i.e., the Board of Ethics, as
<br />being sworn individuals, having the rules and procedures of this board as the effect of
<br />law, and having the ability to subpoena and require testimony, constitutes a civil
<br />authority under the United States. Therefore, your first action in the vote, you have
<br />admitted to violations, knowing and knowingly, of Section—Title 18, Section 3, United
<br />States Code, accessory after the fact. This agenda here is a conspiracy by Lincoln
<br />Ashida and others to prevent me from identifying the actual commission of a fraud in
<br />racketeering, which means there is no tolling statute—this is still going on—and the
<br />alteration of the Hilo streams which has caused the damage here. This is an act which is
<br />known in violation of Title 18, United States Code, 1512, tampering with a witness,
<br />victim, or an informant. The acts of this body constitute a violation of the United States
<br />Code, Criminal Title 18, 1513, retaliation against a witness, victim, or informant. As I
<br />have previously noted, I have placed formal objection to these meetings being held in this
<br />procedure and have filed said with the Circuit Court next door. I see no reason that you
<br />would approve of formal hearings on John Dill if you didn’t approve on the formal
<br />hearings of Lincoln Ashida. And to allow a board of sworn individuals to use secret
<br />documentation against the people in deprivation of their state and federal constitutional
<br />rights exposes you to my actions in the U.S. District Court. Thank you very much.
<br />
<br />10
<br />
<br />
<br />
|