Laserfiche WebLink
in a person that they must act in the way by the continuous non-enforcement of the <br />County Charter, the County Code, the Hawai‘i Revised Statutes, and the federal <br />government, as this board has just demonstrated in two previous votes, constitutes a <br />deprivation of rights under the color of law, a conspiracy against rights for the purpose <br />of sales and involuntary servitude, to instill upon a person that the authority that they are <br />vested with, i.e., this board, the Police Department, or agents of the county and state, do <br />in fact have the constitutional rights to deprive a person of property, due process of law, <br />and equal protections of the law. By doing so, that is a violation of racketeering statutes <br />and intimidating and threatening a witness. Therefore, it would not be fair treatment in <br />order to deprive a person of their state and federal constitutional rights. If this board so <br />determines that there is not sufficient grounds at least for a formal decision, or hearing, <br />and where depositions can be taken, based on the information placed here, then the <br />board is knowing—knowing and knowingly—stating its intent and purpose to deprive and <br />deny citizens their constitutional state and federal rights under the color of law. Thank <br />you very much. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: Are there any questions from other board members? <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: No comment. <br /> <br />MR. HISASHIMA: No comment. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: I only have one question. You said there was a specific document which <br />was filed which—if I’m correct—that Ashida said was false. <br /> <br />MR. COLE: Yes. That was basically a stipulation in the United States District Court, <br />District of Hawai‘i, stipulating that neither the state nor the County of Hawai‘i, by and <br />through their counsel, dispute the fact that the plaintiff in the case, me, was denied their <br />state and federal constitutional rights. That was filed within the documents in the federal <br />court. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: And this was a written agreement— <br /> <br />MR. COLE: --It’s filed—it’s a federal document. It’s filed—I actually have the <br />document. It’s filed and sealed with the court. Lincoln Ashida stated in his letters, I <br />believe that you have them, that I fabricated that document. Now had I fabricated a <br />document in the federal court, I would have been arrested. I mean, that’s a serious <br />offense. To him to state that, knowing and knowingly, that is a fraudulent and false act, <br />for the purpose to influence a public official—that would be Jay Kimura. And Jay <br />Kimura, knowing and knowingly, that that’s a violation of extortion as his 20 years plus <br />of prosecutorial experience, constitutes a conspiracy and deprivation of rights and a <br />violation of Hawai‘i Revised Statutes for extortion, 707-764. To be charged with a penal <br />offense knowing it’s wrong, for one, to act as a public official in such a manner upon <br />knowing it’s wrong, and taking action as a public official, it would have no bearing upon <br />himself, but it would be used to discredit the individual whom it’s targeted. This was <br />done for the purpose that nobody would take me seriously and I would be denied and <br />discredited for bringing forth the evidence of the violations of the federal law that the <br />County of Hawai‘i used in authorizing the modification of the Hilo streams for the <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br /> <br />