Laserfiche WebLink
protection of privileged property owners, apparently to include Judge Hara and Kathy <br />Takase and the Takase families, including Barbara Takase, that altered the Hilo streams, <br />resulting in the $80 million of damages downstream ________. Now I’ll also point out <br />that that information has also been placed into federal records. The Department of <br />Homeland Security has an investigation open on it. The National Insurance Crime <br />Bureau has placed a bulletin out on this. So any time that you try to sell property here, <br />alter property here, they may be questioned and we have no disaster insurance and may <br />in fact be denied these people. It is also pointed out that the altering of the streams is a <br />violation of the 1899 Harbors and Rivers Appropriation Act and is also a violation of <br />Title 42 of the United States Code, where only an act of congress can authorize such <br />change. If you would like the exact documentation, I believe I placed it in the document I <br />submitted to the court earlier. So the actions of Lincoln Ashida, in conspiracy with John <br />Dill, in conspiracy with Jay Kimura, in conspiracy with the Hawai‘i County Police <br />Department, in conspiracy with fellow deputy prosecuting attorney—or corporate <br />counsel attorneys as present—constitutes an overall pattern and history of deprivation of <br />rights in order to hinder the prosecution or discovery of violations of racketeering <br />activity as defined by Title 18, United States Code, 1961. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: I’m reviewing something in the letter here. Do we have any comments or <br />motions from the remaining members? <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: No comment. <br /> <br />MR. HISASHIMA: No comment. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: I’m reading the documents here, and from the documents presented, the <br />whole situation of the stream is irrelevant to this particular matter. We’re looking <br />specifically at the—did Lincoln Ashida make false statements here. And I don’t see— <br /> <br />MR. COLE: --Yes, he did— <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: --I don’t see that with the documentation provided in this petition. <br /> <br />MR. COLE: What about the documentation provided in the other petitions? And the <br />other documentation provided? The fact also would be noted that this board has not <br />placed into the agenda the communications that I have been placing and sending to this <br />board. Why are those communications not included in the agenda as other <br />communications that were placed from petitioners, or respondents, were placed into the <br />board as was the communications of Brenda Ford’s attorney? The testimony that I’ve <br />given in writing constitutes also a portion of your understanding, so all this testimony is <br />on file. It is all pertinent to what is before you. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: In the review that I have seen, I don’t see a need to move forward with <br />this. What about the other board, does the-- <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: Then make a motion. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />