|
where testimony, sworn testimony, depositions, may be taken. I present evidence to you
<br />now of the actual commission of United States Code 1344, bank fraud, and violation of
<br />Hawai‘i Revised Statutes, general fraud. On 2 March of this year, the Hawai‘i County,
<br />by the signatures thereof witnessed thereto of Mayor William Kenoi and Director of
<br />Finance, County of Hawai‘i, Nancy E. Crawford, did so authorize the issuance and sale
<br />to Bank of Hawai‘i of $10 million of series B bond anticipation notes with a maturity date
<br />of September the 2nd, 2-11, with an interest rate of 1.22%, identified as CUSIP number—I
<br />spell C-U-S-I-P—number 41969CAE6. The actual custody of this note is held in Bank of
<br />New York Mellon, 1 Wall Street, 3 Floor, Window A. On the same date, upon selling to
<br />Bank of Hawai‘i $10 million of unauthorized County of Hawai‘i bond anticipation notes,
<br />for the authorization to the notes was identified as Bill 311, Draft 3, which was signed
<br />into law by Mayor Kenoi by his signature witnessed thereof on May the 4, two months
<br />after the issuance of the B bonds. At the same time, on March the 2nd, the County of
<br />Hawai‘i deposited into First Hawaiian Bank Account No. 20010201 the sum of $10
<br />million, term date of 184 days with a maturity date of 2 September, 2001, identical to the
<br />series B bonds. The money was deposited at a percentage rate of 0.1225% and deposited
<br />by the Department of Finance, County of Hawai‘i, General Funds. Upon the same
<br />issuance of that, the County of Hawai‘i, as witnessed thereof by the signature of County
<br />Finance Director Nancy Crawford, issued the tax certificate of the County of Hawai‘i for
<br />exemption to tax of state and federal bonds. In addition, on that date, by her signature,
<br />the deputy—or the director of the County of Hawai‘i also submitted IRS form 8038G,
<br />Information Return for Tax-Exempt Governmental Obligations, identified as general
<br />obligation bond series B with a maturity date of March the 2 2041, with an issue price
<br />of $5 million. Upon the same day, the County of Hawai‘i identifies that it offered to the
<br />Bank of Hawai‘i, solely—as did the sole offering of series B bonds to Bank of Hawai‘i—a
<br />series A bond for $10 million, identified here. So we have a situation that two bonds
<br />were apparently sold. The certificate of issuance, master certificate of issuance, clearly
<br />identifies the bonds were not authorized and therefore illegal in violation of the Hawai‘i
<br />County Charter, in violation of the Hawai‘i Revised Statutes, general fraud, in violation
<br />of the United States Code 18, Subsection 1344, bank fraud and pattern and history
<br />thereof, as two incidents occurred within ten years, constitutes under the definition of
<br />United States Code—or to Title 18, United States Code, 1961, Section 1, racketeering
<br />activity. The racketeering activity is to include the violations as my other petitions
<br />against Chairman John Dill, former prosecuting attorney Jay Kimura, current deputy—
<br />or current Corporation Counsel, County of Hawai‘i, Lincoln Ashida, as in Section A of
<br />Subsection 1 of Title 18, United States Code, 1961, is identified as a racketeering activity
<br />of extortion. The acts of Chairman John Dill, in conspiracy with Lincoln Ashida and Jay
<br />Kimura, constitute a violation of Hawai‘i Revised Statutes 707-764, subjection (i), as a
<br />public official sworn taking action or withholding action in deprivation of a person’s
<br />rights. The deprivation of his rights are identified as the First Amendment rights of the
<br />federal constitution to petition the government in redress of grievance. The continuation
<br />of this board, whether I request a formal opinion—but the continuation of this board in
<br />this matter constitutes that you are all in violation of Title 18, Criminal Code of the
<br />United States Code, Subsection 3, accessory after the fact, pursuant to hindering the
<br />prosecution of, and the identification of, the items of bank fraud, extortion, and
<br />racketeering. I don’t really know what to say here, folks. I’ve been at this awhile. As
<br />you’ve all said, you’ve sworn an oath. This is deprivation of rights under the color of
<br />law, Section 242 of the United States Code, in conspiracy against rights, Section 241,
<br />
<br />2
<br />
<br />
<br />
|